CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 376Personality Traits and PsychologyCultural Differences and ValuesPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

NEO-PI-R Data from 36 Cultures

McCrae, Robert R.·2002·The Five-Factor Model of Personality Across Cultures
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4615-0763-5_6
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4615-0763-5_6

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 36 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Angleitner, A., & Ostendorf, F. (2000, July). The FFM: A comparison of German speaking countries (Austria, Former East and West Germany, and Switzerland). Paper presented at the XXVIIth International Congress of Psychology, Stockholm, Sweden.
  2. Cassaretto, M. (1999). Adaptacion del Inventario de personalidad NEO Revisado (NEO-PI-R) Forma S en un grupo de estudiantes universitarios. Unpublished thesis, Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru, Lima.
  3. Chen, M. C. (1996). Psychosocial correlates of prosocial behavior among college students in Taiwan. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Loyola College in Maryland.
  4. Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
  5. Haven, S., & ten Berge, J. M. F. (1977). Tucker’s coefficient of congruence as a measure of factorial invariance: An empirical study (Heymans Bulletin 290 EX): University of Groningen.
  6. Hoekstra, H. A., Ormel, J., & De Fruyt, F. (1996). Handleiding NEO Persoonlijkheids-vragenlijsten NEO-PI-R en NEO-FFI [Manual for NEO Personality Inventories NEO-PI-R and NEO-FFI]. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
  7. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd. ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  8. Lee, K.-I. (1995). Factor structure and maladaptive group profiles of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory for Koreans. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pusan National University.
  9. Psychological Assessment Resources. (1994). The Revised NEO Personality Inventory: Manual Supplement for the Spanish Edition. Odessa, FL: Author.
  10. Rolland, J. P. (1998). NEO-PI-R: Inventaire de Personnalité-Révisé (Adaptation française). Paris: Les Editions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée.
  11. Shimonaka, Y., Nakazato, K., Gondo, Y., & Takayama, M. (1999). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) manual for the Japanese Version [in Japanese]. Tokyo: Tokyo Shinri.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 376

Related

Metadata

Authors
McCrae, R. R.
Affiliations
National Institute on Aging (US)
Corresponding author
McCrae, Robert R.
ORCID
McCrae, Robert R.
Venue
The Five-Factor Model of Personality Across Cultures
Publisher
Springer US
Published
2002
Pages
105-125
DOI
10.1007/978-1-4615-0763-5_6
OpenAlex
W18139114
Cited by
375
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 28
FWCI
38.20
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
NEO-PI-R, Big Five personality traits, cross-cultural personality, age differences, gender differences, factor structure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review