The Geographic Distribution of Big Five Personality Traits: Patterns and Profiles of Human Self-Description Across 56 Nations
Open accessAbstract
The Big Five Inventory (BFI) is a self-report measure designed to assess the high-order personality traits of Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Neuroticism, and Openness. As part of the International Sexuality Description Project, the BFI was translated from English into 28 languages and administered to 17,837 individuals from 56 nations. The resulting cross-cultural data set was used to address three main questions: Does the factor structure of the English BFI fully replicate across cultures? How valid are the BFI trait profiles of individual nations? And how are personality traits distributed throughout the world? The five-dimensional structure was robust across major regions of the world. Trait levels were related in predictable ways to self-esteem, sociosexuality, and national personality profiles. People from the geographic regions of South America and East Asia were significantly different in openness from those inhabiting other world regions. The discussion focuses on limitations of the current data set and important directions for future research.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Big 5 model suggests that human beings differ from each other with respect to openness to new experience, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism.
“The Big 5 model of interpersonal variation suggests that human beings differ from each other with respect to the traits of openness to new experience, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism [51, 52].”
From Five studies evaluating the impact on mental health and mood of recalling, reading, and discussing fiction (2022) · cites this paper as [52]
Cites
Society and the Adolescent Self-Image
Rosenberg, M. (1965) · doi:10.1515/9781400876136 · Cited by 30,126 · see citing works
Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0046016 · Cited by 17,116 · see citing works
Construct validity in psychological tests.
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0040957 · Cited by 11,195 · see citing works
Benet-Martínez, V., & John, O. P. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.75.3.729 · Cited by 1,996 · see citing works
Self-citationPersonality disorders and the five factor model of personality
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1990) · Journal of Personality Disorders · doi:10.1521/pedi.1990.4.4.362 · Cited by 1,653 · see citing works
Self-citationExtraversion and Its Positive Emotional Core
Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1997) · Handbook of Personality Psychology · doi:10.1016/b978-012134645-4/50030-5 · Cited by 1,081 · see citing works
Cross cultural evidence for the fundamental features of extraversion
Lucas, R. E., Diener, E., Grob, A., Suh, E. M., & Shao, L. (2000) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.3.452 · Cited by 713 · see citing works
NEO-PI-R Data from 36 Cultures
McCrae, R. R. (2002) · The Five-Factor Model of Personality Across Cultures · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-0763-5_6 · Cited by 375 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The weirdest people in the world?
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x0999152x · Cited by 12,641 · see citing works
Anderson, C. A., Shibuya, A., Ihori, N., Swing, E. L., Bushman, B. J., Sakamoto, A., Rothstein, H. R., & Saleem, M. (2010) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0018251 · Cited by 2,048 · see citing works
Schmitt, D. P., Realo, A., Voracek, M., & Allik, J. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.168 · Cited by 1,391 · see citing works
Self-citationPersonality Development: Continuity and Change Over the Life Course
McAdams, D. P., & Olson, B. D. (2010) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100507 · Cited by 931 · see citing works
Schaller, M., & Murray, D. R. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.212 · Cited by 647 · see citing works
Gurven, M., von Rueden, C., Massenkoff, M., Kaplan, H., & Lero Vie, M. (2013) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0030841 · Cited by 415 · see citing works
Denissen, J. J. A., Penke, L., Schmitt, D. P., & van Aken, M. A. G. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.181 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Self-citationChallenges to capture the big five personality traits in non-WEIRD populations
Laajaj, R., Macours, K., Pinzon Hernandez, D. A., Arias, O., Gosling, S. D., Potter, J., Rubio-Codina, M., & Vakis, R. (2019) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaw5226 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Personality and healthy sleep: the importance of conscientiousness and neuroticism
Duggan, K. A., Friedman, H. S., McDevitt, E. A., & Mednick, S. C. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0090628 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Antecedents and consequences of trust in a social media brand: A cross-cultural study of Twitter
Pentina, I., Zhang, L., & Basmanova, O. (2013) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.045 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Divergent Effects of Beliefs in Heaven and Hell on National Crime Rates
Shariff, A. F., & Rhemtulla, M. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0039048 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Regional ambient temperature is associated with human personality
Wei, W., Lu, J. G., Galinsky, A. D., Wu, H., Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., Yuan, W., Zhang, Q., Guo, Y., Zhang, M., et al. (2017) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-017-0240-0 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Dirty habits? Online pornography use, personality, obsessionality, and compulsivity
Egan, V., & Parmar, R. (2013) · Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy · doi:10.1080/0092623x.2012.710182 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Gebauer, J. E., Sedikides, C., Wagner, J., Bleidorn, W., Rentfrow, P. J., Potter, J., & Gosling, S. D. (2015) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspp0000052 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Trindade, I. A., Ferreira, N. B., Mendes, A. L., Ferreira, C., Dawson, D., & Golijani-Moghaddam, N. (2021) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2021.05.002 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Understanding Patient Personality in Medical Care: Five-Factor Model
Redelmeier, D. A., Najeeb, U., & Etchells, E. E. (2021) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-021-06598-8 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Musiat, P., Potterton, R., Gordon, G., Spencer, L., Zeiler, M., Waldherr, K., Kuso, S., Nitsch, M., Adamcik, T., Wagner, G., et al. (2019) · Internet Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.invent.2018.02.004 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Carney, J., & Robertson, C. (2022) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0266323 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Sluggish Cognitive Tempo and Personality: Links to BIS/BAS Sensitivity and the Five Factor Model
Becker, S. P., Schmitt, A. P., Jarrett, M. A., Luebbe, A. M., Garner, A. A., Epstein, J. N., & Burns, G. L. (2018) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2018.06.001 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Goldner, L. (2016) · Child & Youth Care Forum · doi:10.1007/s10566-015-9319-9 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Personality and the Varieties of Fictional Experience
Michelson, D. (2014) · Journal of Aesthetic Education · doi:10.5406/jaesteduc.48.2.0064 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Can LLMs Infer Conversational Agent Users' Personality Traits from Chat History?
Cögendez, D., Zimmermann, V., & Zufferey, N. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.19785
“Distribution of Big-Five scores between the UK and USA populations does not differ substantially, except for a slightly higher overall agreeableness in the USA [27].”
- Authors
- Schmitt, D. P., Allik, J., McCrae, R. R., & Benet-Martínez, V.
- Affiliations
- Bradley University (US)
- University of Tartu
- National Institute on Aging (US)
- University of California, Riverside
- Venue
- Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2007-03
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 173-212
- ISSN
- 0022-0221 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5422
- OpenAlex
- W2148795955
- Cited by
- 1,222
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 60 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 76 · 2022: 91 · 2021: 80 · 2020: 116 · 2019: 92 · 2018: 86 · 2017: 78 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 63 · 2013: 60 · 2012: 49
- FWCI
- 37.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology (publishedVersion)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- OAR@UM (University of Malta) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Institutional Research Information System (University of Udine) (submittedVersion)
- KOPS (University of Konstanz) (submittedVersion)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- Big Five personality traits, cross-cultural replication, factor structure, self-esteem, sociosexuality, openness to experience, extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review