The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Stress, Culture, and Community
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“According to the theory, individuals with a strong resource pool will invest their resources in order to improve their condition and obtain new resources.”
From Job demands–resources model in the context of recovery: Testing recovery experiences as mediators (2011) · cites this paper as Hobfoll, 1998
In the citing paper
“On the basis of the COR theory, stress occurs when an individual's valued resources (e.g., energy) are threatened or lost or when no resources are gained after resource investment.”
From Job demands–resources model in the context of recovery: Testing recovery experiences as mediators (2011) · cites this paper as Hobfoll, 1998
In the citing paper
“Thus, resources tend to accumulate and generate other resources.”
From Job demands–resources model in the context of recovery: Testing recovery experiences as mediators (2011) · cites this paper as Hobfoll, 1998
In the citing paper
“Thus, employees who have high resources on the job are likely to have more internal resources (e.g., energy, self-efficacy) available for new challenges and learning, that is, for mastery experiences during nonwork time, and via restoring threatened or creating new resources, these experiences help recover and maintain work engagement.”
From Job demands–resources model in the context of recovery: Testing recovery experiences as mediators (2011) · cites this paper as Hobfoll, 1998
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hobfoll, S. E., Halbesleben, J., Neveu, J.-P., & Westman, M. (2018) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104640 · Cited by 5,781
Self-citationSocial and Psychological Resources and Adaptation
Hobfoll, S. E. (2002) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.6.4.307 · Cited by 4,594
Self-citationCarver, C. S., & Connor-Smith, J. (2010) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100352 · Cited by 2,424
Positive affect and the other side of coping.
Folkman, S., & Moskowitz, J. T. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.55.6.647 · Cited by 2,471
Conservation of resource caravans and engaged settings
Hobfoll, S. E. (2011) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.2010.02016.x · Cited by 1,814
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hobfoll, S. E.
- Publisher
- Springer US
- Published
- 1998
- Cited by
- 989
- References
- 0
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
