When Should a Robot Apologize? Understanding How Timing Affects Human-Robot Trust Repair

An integrative model of organizational trust

Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258792 · Cited by 10,736

Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance

Lee, J. D., & See, K. A. (2004) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/hfes.46.1.50_30392 · Cited by 6,605

Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse

Parasuraman, R., & Riley, V. (1997) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/001872097778543886 · Cited by 4,554

A Meta-Analysis of Factors Affecting Trust in Human-Robot Interaction

Hancock, P. A., Billings, D. R., Schaefer, K. E., Chen, J. Y. C., de Visser, E. J., & Parasuraman, R. (2011) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720811417254 · Cited by 2,051

Getting to Know You: Reputation and Trust in a Two-Person Economic Exchange

King-Casas, B., Tomlin, D., Anen, C., Camerer, C. F., Quartz, S. R., & Montague, P. R. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1108062 · Cited by 1,345

The role of trust in automation reliance

Dzindolet, M. T., Peterson, S. A., Pomranky, R. A., Pierce, L. G., & Beck, H. P. (2003) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/s1071-5819(03)00038-7 · Cited by 1,276

Similarities and differences between human–human and human–automation trust: an integrative review

Madhavan, P., & Wiegmann, D. A. (2007) · Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science · doi:10.1080/14639220500337708 · Cited by 577

Overtrust of robots in emergency evacuation scenarios

Robinette, P., Li, W., Allen, R., Howard, A. M., & Wagner, A. R. (2016) · 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1109/hri.2016.7451740 · Cited by 468

Trust and etiquette in high-criticality automated systems

Parasuraman, R., & Miller, C. A. (2004) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/975817.975844 · Cited by 311

Decision support aids with anthropomorphic characteristics influence trust and performance in younger and older adults

Pak, R., Fink, N. P., Price, M. M., Bass, B. M., & Sturre, L. (2012) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139.2012.691554 · Cited by 204

Time pressure and stress as a factor during emergency egress

Özel, F. (2001) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/s0925-7535(00)00061-8 · Cited by 152

Timing Is Key for Robot Trust Repair

Robinette, P., Howard, A. M., & Wagner, A. R. (2015) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-25554-5_57 · Cited by 121

The Influence of Task Load and Automation Trust on Deception Detection

Biros, D. P., Daly, M., & Gunsch, G. H. (2004) · Group Decision and Negotiation · doi:10.1023/b:grup.0000021840.85686.57 · Cited by 120

Human Mobility Modeling for Robot-Assisted Evacuation in Complex Indoor Environments

Tang, B., Jiang, C., He, H., & Guo, Y. P. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems · doi:10.1109/thms.2016.2571269 · Cited by 61

Insights toward robot-assisted evacuation

Shell, D. A., & Matarić, M. J. (2005) · Advanced Robotics · doi:10.1163/1568553055011483 · Cited by 44

Assessment of robot guidance modalities conveying instructions to humans in emergency situations

Robinette, P., Wagner, A. R., & Howard, A. (2014) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/roman.2014.6926390 · Cited by 27

Methodology for study of human-robot social interaction in dangerous situations

Atkinson, D. J., & Clark, M. H. (2014) · International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction (HAI) · doi:10.1145/2658861.2658871 · Cited by 26

Testing the Efficacy of Human-Human Trust Repair Strategies with Machines

Quinn, D. B., Pak, R., & de Visser, E. J. (2017) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1541931213601930 · Cited by 22

Trust in emergency evacuation robots

Robinette, P., & Howard, A. (2012) · IEEE International Symposium on Safety, Security, and Rescue Robotics (SSRR) · doi:10.1109/ssrr.2012.6523903 · Cited by 17

Towards a Theory of Longitudinal Trust Calibration in Human–Robot Teams

de Visser, E. J., Peeters, M. M. M., Jung, M. F., Kohn, S., Shaw, T. H., Pak, R., & Neerincx, M. A. (2020) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-019-00596-x · Cited by 447

Measuring and Understanding Trust Calibrations for Automated Systems: A Survey of the State-Of-The-Art and Future Directions

Wischnewski, M., Krämer, N., & Müller, E. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3581197 · Cited by 146

Three Strikes and you are out!: The impacts of multiple human–robot trust violations and repairs on robot trustworthiness

Esterwood, C., & Jr, L. P. R. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2023.107658 · Cited by 98

A Literature Review of Trust Repair in HRI

Esterwood, C. T., & Robert, L. (2022) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/ro-man53752.2022.9900667 · Cited by 61

Exploring the Relationship Between Ethics and Trust in Human–Artificial Intelligence Teaming: A Mixed Methods Approach

Textor, C., Zhang, R., Lopez, J., Schelble, B. G., McNeese, N. J., Freeman, G., Pak, R., Tossell, C. C., & de Visser, E. J. (2022) · Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making · doi:10.1177/15553434221113964 · Cited by 69

When Do We Accept Mistakes from Chatbots? The Impact of Human-Like Communication on User Experience in Chatbots That Make Mistakes

Siqueira, M. A. D. S., Müller, B. C. N., & Bosse, T. (2023) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2023.2175158 · Cited by 62

Can Complexity-Thinking Methods Contribute to Improving Occupational Safety in Industry 4.0? A Review of Safety Analysis Methods and Their Concepts

Adriaensen, A., Decré, W., & Pintelon, L. M. (2019) · Safety · doi:10.3390/safety5040065 · Cited by 57

Having the Right Attitude: How Attitude Impacts Trust Repair in Human—Robot Interaction

Esterwood, C., & Robert, L. P. (2022) · 2022 17th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1109/hri53351.2022.9889535 · Cited by 36

Assessment of Trust in Automation in the “Real World”: Requirements for New Trust in Automation Measurement Techniques for Use by Practitioners

Tenhundfeld, N. L., Demir, M., & de Visser, E. J. (2022) · Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making · doi:10.1177/15553434221096261 · Cited by 26

Evaluating the Impact of Emotional Apology on Human-Robot Trust

Xu, J. C., & Howard, A. (2022) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/ro-man53752.2022.9900518 · Cited by 26

Expect the Unexpected: Leveraging the Human-Robot Ecosystem to Handle Unexpected Robot Failures

Honig, S., & Oron-Gilad, T. (2021) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2021.656385 · Cited by 21

AI apology: a critical review of apology in AI systems

Harland, H., Dazeley, R., Senaratne, H., Vamplew, P., Cruz, F., & Nakisa, B. (2025) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-025-11305-8 · Cited by 19

A theoretical model to explain mixed effects of trust repair strategies in autonomous systems

Pak, R., & Rovira, E. M. (2023) · Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science · doi:10.1080/1463922x.2023.2250424 · Cited by 16

The Reason for an Apology Matters for Robot Trust Repair

Perkins, R., Khavas, Z. R., McCallum, K., Kotturu, M. R., & Robinette, P. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-24670-8_56 · Cited by 15

"The robot may not notice my discomfort" – Examining the Experience of Vulnerability for Trust in Human-Robot Interaction

Hannibal, G., Weiss, A., & Charisi, V. (2021) · 2021 30th IEEE International Conference on Robot & Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN) · doi:10.1109/ro-man50785.2021.9515513 · Cited by 11

When Automation Fails: Examining the Effect of a Verbal Recovery Strategy on User Experience in Automated Driving

Xu, Z., Wang, G., Zhai, S., & Liu, P. (2025) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2023.2176986 · Cited by 12

AI apology: interactive multi-objective reinforcement learning for human-aligned AI

Harland, H., Dazeley, R., Nakisa, B., Cruz, F., & Vamplew, P. W. (2023) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-023-08586-x · Cited by 15

To Err is Automation: Can Trust be Repaired by the Automated Driving System After its Failure?

Liu, P., Chu, Y., Wang, G., & Xu, Z. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems · doi:10.1109/thms.2024.3434680 · Cited by 10

Continual Learning Through Human-Robot Interaction: Human Perceptions of a Continual Learning Robot in Repeated Interactions

Ayub, A., Francesco, Z. D., Holthaus, P., Nehaniv, C. L., & Dautenhahn, K. (2025) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-025-01214-9 · Cited by 12

Convergence Across Behavioral and Self-report Measures Evaluating Individuals' Trust in an Autonomous Golf Cart

Cotter, J. E., O’Hear, E. H., Smitherman, R. C., Bright, A. B., Tenhundfeld, N. L., Forsyth, J. B., Sprague, N. R., & El-Tawab, S. (2022) · Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium · doi:10.1109/sieds55548.2022.9799431 · Cited by 7

TURIN: A coding system for Trust in hUman Robot INteraction

Hulcelle, M., Varni, G., Rollet, N., & Clavel, C. (2021) · International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction and workshops · doi:10.1109/acii52823.2021.9597448 · Cited by 5

Aiding Emergency Evacuations Using Obstacle-Aware Path Clearing

Nayyar, M., & Wagner, A. R. (2021) · IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts (ARSO) · doi:10.1109/arso51874.2021.9542834 · Cited by 2

Granting a Second Chance: How Recovery Strategies Shape Perceptions of Intelligent Agent Errors

Miao, X., Tang, J., Peng, K., & Wang, F. (2025) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/ro-man63969.2025.11217814 · Cited by 2

Validation and Evacuee Modeling of Virtual Robot-guided Emergency Evacuation ExperimentsPreprint

Yin, Y., Nayyar, M., Holman, D., Lucas, G., Holbrook, C., & Wagner, A. R. (2025) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/mr78s_v2

When Robots Say No: Temporal Trust Recovery Through Explanation

Webb, N., Huang, Z., Milivojević, S., Baber, C., & Hunt, E. R. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-2379-5_29

Expertise Matters in AI Adoption: A Comparative Study of Retina Specialists and General Ophthalmologists in AI-CAD Adoption

Yoon, J., Kim, T., Han, J. J., Hwang, J. S., Han, J. M., Park, J. I., Song, H., & Hwang, D. D.-J. (2025) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2025.2603628

Automatic analysis of trust over the course of a human-robot interaction using multimodal features and recurrent neural architectures

Hulcelle, M. (2023) · doi:10.70675/f2a5a335z5d6fz4c69z9a33z075b32b0d6d3

Robotics and Trust

Rabe, J., Sciutti, A., Zonca, J., Pasquali, D., & Rea, F. (2026) · Springer tracts in advanced robotics · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-19374-2_22

Timing Is Key for Robot Trust Repair

Robinette, P., Howard, A. M., & Wagner, A. R. (2015) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-25554-5_57 · Cited by 121

Human-Robot Trust in Time-Sensitive Scenarios

Xu, J. (2022) · SMARTech Repository (Georgia Institute of Technology)

Evaluating the Impact of Emotional Apology on Human-Robot Trust

Xu, J. C., & Howard, A. (2022) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/ro-man53752.2022.9900518 · Cited by 26

Three Strikes and you are out!: The impacts of multiple human–robot trust violations and repairs on robot trustworthiness

Esterwood, C., & Jr, L. P. R. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2023.107658 · Cited by 98

Evaluating People’s Perceptions of Trust in a Robot in a Repeated Interactions Study

Rossi, A., Dautenhahn, K., Koay, K. L., Walters, M. L., & Holthaus, P. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-62056-1_38 · Cited by 20