Cited by 22Social Robot Interaction and HRIAI in Service InteractionsInnovative Human-Technology Interaction

CivicBots – Chatbots for Supporting Youth in Societal Participation

Väänänen, Kaisa, Hiltunen, Aleksi, Varsaluoma, Jari, Pietilä, Iikka·2020·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-39540-7_10

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Chatbots have been suggested as accessible interactive systems for visually impaired users, as conversational support for users with special needs, and to support youth engagement in societal issues.

    “Chatbots have been suggested as accessible interactive systems for visually impaired in need of an easily navigable user interface [7], as conversational support for users with special needs [19], and to support youth to engage in societal issues [110].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Meriläinen, N., Pietilä, I., Varsaluoma, J.: Digital services and youth participation in processes of social change: world café workshops in Finland. In: 2018 ECPR General Conference, Universität Hamburg (2018)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Väänänen, K., Hiltunen, A., Varsaluoma, J., & Pietilä, I.
Affiliations
Tampere University (FI)
Corresponding author
Väänänen, Kaisa
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2020
Pages
143-157
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W3000008633
Cited by
22
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3
FWCI
4.58
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • Tampere University Institutional Repository (Tampere University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Keywords
chatbots, citizen participation, youth participation, digital democracy, urban planning, legislation, human-centered design, trustworthiness, privacy concerns, equality, user perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review