Cited by 270Digital Mental Health InterventionsEthics and Social Impacts of AISocial Robot Interaction and HRI

Can Your Phone Be Your Therapist? Young People’s Ethical Perspectives on the Use of Fully Automated Conversational Agents (Chatbots) in Mental Health Support

Open access
Kretzschmar, Kira, Tyroll, Holly, Pavarini, Gabriela, Manzini, Arianna, Singh, Ilina, NeurOx Young People’s Advisory Group·2019·Biomedical Informatics Insights

Abstract

Over the last decade, there has been an explosion of digital interventions that aim to either supplement or replace face-to-face mental health services. More recently, a number of automated conversational agents have also been made available, which respond to users in ways that mirror a real-life interaction. What are the social and ethical concerns that arise from these advances? In this article, we discuss, from a young person’s perspective, the strengths and limitations of using chatbots in mental health support. We also outline what we consider to be minimum ethical standards for these platforms, including issues surrounding privacy and confidentiality, efficacy, and safety, and review three existing platforms (Woebot, Joy, and Wysa) according to our proposed framework. It is our hope that this article will stimulate ethical debate among app developers, practitioners, young people, and other stakeholders, and inspire ethically responsible practice in digital mental health.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1178222619829083

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [19]Khan L Parsonage M Stubbs J Investing in children’s mental health: a review of evidence on the costs and benefits of increased service provision. https://www.crisiscareconcordat.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/investing_in_childrens_mental_health.pdf. Up-dated 2015.
  2. [35]West JS Kayser L Overton P Saltmarsh R. Student perceptions that inhibit the initiation of counseling. Sch Couns. 1991; 39: 77– 83.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kretzschmar, K., Tyroll, H., Pavarini, G., Manzini, A., Singh, I., & NeurOx Young People’s Advisory Group
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Pavarini, Gabriela
Venue
Biomedical Informatics Insights
Published
2019-01
Volume
11
Pages
1178222619829083-1178222619829083
ISSN
1178-2226 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2920018355
Cited by
270
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 4
FWCI
29.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biomedical Informatics Insights (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • wellcome trust (104825/Z/14/Z, 203329/Z/16/Z, 203132/Z/16/Z)
  • national institute for health research (IS-BRC-1215-20005)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Keywords
chatbots, digital mental health, youth, ethics, privacy and confidentiality, treatment efficacy and safety, Woebot, joy, Wysa, moral norms, mental health apps

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review