From Nature of Science to Social Justice: The Political Power of Epistemic Lessons
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Scientific information can, and often is, shaped by funding.
“Scientific information can, and often is, shaped by funding (Allchin, 2020;Erduran & Dagher, 2014).”
From Learning to evaluate sources of science (mis)information on the internet: Assessing students' scientific online reasoning (2025) · cites this paper as Allchin, 2020
Cites
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
Fricker, M. (2007) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237907.001.0001 · Cited by 9,198 · see citing works
Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry
Longino, H. E. (1990) · doi:10.1515/9780691209753 · Cited by 3,092 · see citing works
Longino, H. E. (2002) · doi:10.1515/9780691187013 · Cited by 1,622 · see citing works
Reconceptualizing nature‐of‐science education in the age of social media
Höttecke, D., & Allchin, D. (2020) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.21575 · Cited by 303 · cited 3× · see citing works
“One must focus on the entire reach of science—from test tubes to YouTube, from the lab bench to the judicial bench, from field site to website, from lab book to Facebook—or “Whole Science” (Allchin 2010, 2011, 2012b, 2013, 2017a; Höttecke and Allchin 2020).”
BackgroundSelf-citationScience as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry
LONGINO, H. E. (2020) · doi:10.2307/j.ctvx5wbfz · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Gaon, S., & Norris, S. P. (2001) · Journal of Philosophy of Education · doi:10.1111/1467-9752.00220 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pimentel, D. R. (2025) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21974 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
- Authors
- Allchin, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Corresponding author
- Allchin, Douglas
- ORCID
- Allchin, Douglas
- Venue
- Science: Philosophy, History and Education
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2020
- Pages
- 23-39
- ISSN
- 2520-8594 (ISSN-L)
- 2520-8608
- OpenAlex
- W3085025887
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 7.36
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Science: Philosophy, history and education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Keywords
- nature of science, social justice, scientific credibility, scientific expertise, scientific uncertainty, conflicts of interest, science communication, cultural ideology, gender bias, racial bias, class bias, epistemic trust, science education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
