CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 86E-Government and Public ServicesPublic Policy and Administration ResearchPublic Administration and Political Analysis

Barriers and Drivers of Digital Transformation in Public Organizations: Results from a Survey in the Netherlands

Open access
Tangi, Luca, Janssen, Marijn, Benedetti, Michele, Noci, Giuliano·2020·Lecture Notes in Computer Science
DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-57599-1_4
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-57599-1_4

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Similar results were found in a previous study carried out in the Netherlands, suggesting the possibility of generalization.

    “Similar results were found in a previous study carried out in the Netherlands (Tangi et al., 2020), suggesting the possibility of generalization.”

    From Digital government transformation: A structural equation modelling analysis of driving and impeding factors (2021) · cites this paper as Tangi et al., 2020

    The Conclusion reports results from a survey in the Netherlands, so the cited paper is a previous Dutch study with relevant findings. The citing sentence does not specify which results are similar, so that comparison cannot be verified from the source alone. The Conclusion also says that research in another country is needed to determine whether its findings generalize. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • The same trend of partial digitalization and ongoing DGT can be found in countries having very different dimensions, institutional characteristics, and pervasiveness in the usage of digital technologies in public affairs.

    “These results were similar to the ones obtained in a previous study in the Netherlands (Tangi et al., 2020), highlighting that the same trend can be found in countries having very different dimensions, institutional characteristics, and pervasiveness in the usage of digital technologies in public affairs (for this feature we referred to the last benchmarking analysis by the European Commission (20”

    From Digital government transformation: A structural equation modelling analysis of driving and impeding factors (2021) · cites this paper as Tangi et al., 2020

  • The analysis is limited to the Italian context and did not collect evidence from other countries.

    “Moreover, we delineate the analysis in the Italian context and even though similar results were found in a previous study carried out in the Netherlands (Tangi et al., 2020), suggesting the possibility to explore generalization, we did not collect evidence from other countries.”

    From Digital government transformation: A structural equation modelling analysis of driving and impeding factors (2021) · cites this paper as Tangi et al., 2020

  • The study excluded the effect of internal and external drivers.

    “For example, we excluded the effect of internal and external drivers (Tangi et al., 2020).”

    From Digital government transformation: A structural equation modelling analysis of driving and impeding factors (2021) · cites this paper as Tangi et al., 2020

  • Bigger organizations are expected to need more bureaucratic work, having standard procedures embedded in the organizational culture.

    “Following a similar argument, bigger organizations are expected to need more bureaucratic work, having standard procedures embedded in the organizational culture (Weerakkody et al., 2019;Tangi et al., 2020).”

    From Digital government transformation: A structural equation modelling analysis of driving and impeding factors (2021) · cites this paper as Tangi et al., 2020

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. K. Mohammad, "E-Leadership: The Emerging New Leadership for the Virtual Organization," J. Manag. Sci., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1-21, 2009.
  2. V. Weerakkody, "Moving from E-Government to T-Government: A Study of Process Reengineering Challenges in a UK Local Authority Context.," Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 1-16, 2008.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Tangi, L., Janssen, M., Benedetti, M., & Noci, G.
Affiliations
Politecnico di Milano (IT)
Corresponding author
Tangi, Luca
ORCID
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published
2020
Volume
LNCS-12219
Pages
42-56
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
DOI
10.1007/978-3-030-57599-1_4
OpenAlex
W3080847505
Cited by
86
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8
FWCI
36.58
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • Virtual Community of Pathological Anatomy (University of Castilla La Mancha) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion)
  • Research Repository (Delft University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration and Political Analysis
Keywords
digital transformation, public administration, e-government, organizational change, barriers to digitalization, drivers of digital transformation, ICT adoption, external pressure, social systems, information systems, Dutch public sector

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review