CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 14Tactile and Sensory InteractionsDigital Accessibility for DisabilitiesAssistive Technology in Communication and Mobility

Evaluating micro-guidance sonification methods in manual tasks for blind and visually impaired people.

Open access
Guarese, Renan, Zambetta, Fabio, van Schyndel, Ron·2022·Proceedings of the 34th Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction
DOI 10.1145/3572921.3572929
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

This paper presents a user evaluation of seven sonification methods in two-dimensional (2D) manual micro-guidance tasks, which can be used as building blocks for spatialized audio in Mixed and Virtual Reality to model next-generation guidance aids for the Blind and Visually Impaired (BVI). The methods were tested in comparable interactive sonifications of 2D positions in a series of hand-navigation assessments with BVI and blindfolded sighted users, to validate the different approaches in environments without any visual feedback. Results highlighted that alternation and spatiality can be useful resources in sonified guidance, and that users accustomed to faster-than-regular audio speed replay tend to have more precise performances, while musical literacy only had a performance effect on methods highly dependent on aural skills. Ultimately, this work corroborates the notion that sonification may help BVI users perform better in day-to-day manual micro-guidance tasks such as retrieving items from a pantry, handling kitchen appliances, and properly discarding trash.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3572921.3572929

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sonification-based user interfaces that use one fixed background sound and increase its frequency as the user gets closer to the target are familiar to users with blindness or visual impairment because they are used in other aid technologies.

    “This technology is familiar to users with BVI since it is used in other aid technologies (26, 27) including pinpointing a target rotation direction (28, 29), aiming a camera to the correct angle (30) or for learning line shapes (31).”

    From SONOICE! a Sonar–Voice dynamic user interface for assisting individuals with blindness and visual impairment in pinpointing elements in 2D tactile readers (2024) · cites this paper as [27]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 1 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 62

  1. Dragan Ahmetovic, Federico Avanzini, Adriano Baratè, Cristian Bernareggi, Gabriele Galimberti, Luca A. Ludovico, Sergio Mascetti, and Giorgio Presti. 2019. Sonification of Rotation Instructions to Support Navigation of People with Visual Impairment. In 2019 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1109/PERCOM.2019.8767407 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Dragan Ahmetovic, Roberto Manduchi, James M. Coughlan, and Sergio Mascetti. 2017. Mind Your Crossings: Mining GIS Imagery for Crosswalk Localization. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 9, 4, Article 11 (April 2017), 25 pages. https://doi. org/10.1145/3046790 · DOI
  3. Robert Albrecht, R. Väänänen, and T. Lokki. 2016. Guided by music: pedestrian and cyclist navigation with route and beacon guidance. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 20 (2016), 121-145.
  4. amit barde, matt ward, robert lindeman, and mark billinghurst. 2020. the use of spatialised auditory and visual cues for target acqusition in a search task. journal of the audio engineering society (august 2020).
  5. Costas Boletsis and Dimitra Chasanidou. 2018. Smart tourism in cities: Exploring urban destinations with audio augmented reality. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 515-521. https://doi.org/10.1145/3197768.3201549 · DOI
  6. Gregory D. Clemenson, Antonella Maselli, Alexander J. Fiannaca, Amos Miller, and Mar Gonzalez-Franco. 2021. Rethinking GPS navigation: creating cognitive maps through auditory clues. Scientific Reports 11 (apr 2021). https://doi.org/10. 1038/s41598-021-87148-4 · DOI
  7. Robert F. Cohen, Valerie Haven, Jessica A. Lanzoni, Arthur Meacham, Joelle Skaff, and Michael Wissell. 2006. Using an Audio Interface to Assist Users Who Are Visually Impaired with Steering Tasks. In Proceedings of the 8th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Portland, Oregon, USA) (Assets '06). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 119-124. https://doi.org/10.1145/1168987.1169008 · DOI
  8. James M. Coughlan, Brandon Biggs, Marc-Aurèle Rivière, and Huiying Shen. 2020. An Audio-Based 3D Spatial Guidance AR System for Blind Users. In Computers Helping People with Special Needs, Klaus Miesenberger, Roberto Manduchi, Mario Covarrubias Rodriguez, and Petr Peňáz (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 475-484.
  9. Marcelo De Paiva Guimarães and Valeria Farinazzo Martins. 2014. A Checklist to Evaluate Augmented Reality Applications. In 2014 XVI Symposium on Virtual and Augmented Reality. 45-52. https://doi.org/10.1109/SVR.2014.17 · DOI
  10. Manfred Diaz, Roger Girgis, Thomas Fevens, and Jeremy Cooperstock. 2017. To Veer or Not to Veer: Learning from Experts How to Stay Within the Crosswalk. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCVW). 1470-1479. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCVW.2017.174 · DOI
  11. Jens Einsiedler, Oliver Sawade, Bernd Schäufele, Marcus Witzke, and Ilja Radusch. 2012. Indoor micro navigation utilizing local infrastructure-based positioning. In 2012 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium. 993-998. https://doi.org/10.1109/IVS. 2012.6232262 · DOI
  12. Tristan C. Endsley, Kelly A. Sprehn, Ryan M. Brill, Kimberly J. Ryan, Emily C. Vincent, and James M. Martin. 2017. Augmented Reality Design Heuristics: Designing for Dynamic Interactions. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 61, 1 (2017), 2100-2104. https://doi.org/10. 1177/1541931213602007 · DOI
  13. Agebson Rocha Façanha, Ticianne Darin, Windson Viana, and Jaime Sánchez. 2020. O&M Indoor Virtual Environments for People Who Are Blind: A Systematic Literature Review. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 13, 2, Article 9a (Aug. 2020), 42 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3395769 · DOI
  14. Nathan Gale, Pejman Mirza-Babaei, and Isabel Pedersen. 2015. Heuristic guide- lines for wearable augmented reality applications. CHI PLAY 2015 -Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play, 529-534. https://doi.org/10.1145/2793107.2810309 · DOI
  15. Jerônimo G Grandi, Zekun Cao, Mark Ogren, and Regis Kopper. 2021. Design and Simulation of Next-Generation Augmented Reality User Interfaces in Virtual Reality. In 2021 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW). 23-29. https://doi.org/10.1109/VRW52623.2021.00011 · DOI
  16. Renan Guarese, Franklin Bastidas, João Becker, Mariane Giambastiani, Yhonatan Iquiapaza, Lennon Macedo, Luciana Nedel, Anderson Maciel, Fabio Zambetta, and Ron Schyndel. 2021. Cooking in the dark: a mixed reality empathy experience for the embodiment of blindness. In Proceedings of the 1st XR in Games Workshop (New York). SBC, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil. https://doi.org/10.5753/xr_in_games. 2021.15680 · DOI
  17. Renan Guarese, Franklin Bastidas, João Becker, Mariane Giambastiani, Yhonatan Iquiapaza, Lennon Macedo, Luciana Nedel, Anderson Maciel, Fabio Zambetta, and Ron van Schyndel. 2021. Cooking in the Dark: Exploring Spatial Audio as MR Assistive Technology for the Visually Impaired. In Human-Computer-Interaction -INTERACT 2021, Carmelo Ardito, Rosa Lanzilotti, Alessio Malizia, Helen Petrie, Antonio Piccinno, Giuseppe Desolda, and Kori Inkpen (Eds.). Springer Interna- tional Publishing, Cham, 318-322.
  18. J Guerreiro, Daisuke Sato, Dragan Ahmetovic, Eshed Ohn-Bar, Kris Kitani, and Chieko Asakawa. 2019. Virtual Navigation for Blind People: Transferring Route Knowledge to the Real-World. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 135 (10 2019), 102369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.102369 · DOI
  19. Dhruv Jain, Sasa Junuzovic, Eyal Ofek, Mike Sinclair, John Porter, Chris Yoon, Swetha Machanavajhala, and Meredith Ringel Morris. 2021. A Taxonomy of Sounds in Virtual Reality. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 160-170. https://doi.org/10.1145/3461778.3462106 · DOI
  20. Watthanasak Jeamwatthanachai, Mike Wald, and Gary Wills. 2019. Indoor naviga- tion by blind people: Behaviors and challenges in unfamiliar spaces and buildings. British Journal of Visual Impairment 37, 2 (2019), 140-153. https://doi.org/10. 1177/0264619619833723 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/0264619619833723 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Redouane Kachach, Pablo Perez, Alvaro Villegas, and Ester Gonzalez-Sosa. 2020. Blindness Visualizer: A Simulated Navigation Experience. Proceedings -2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces, VRW 2020, 504-506. https://doi.org/10.1109/VRW50115.2020.00107 · DOI
  22. Fatima Zahra Kaghat, Ahmed Azough, Mohammed Fakhour, and Mohammed Meknassi. 2020. A new audio augmented reality interaction and adaptation model for museum visits. Computers and Electrical Engineering 84 (6 2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2020.106606 · DOI
  23. Brian Katz, Florian Dramas, Gaëtan Parseihian, Olivier Gutierrez, Slim Kammoun, Adrien Brilhault, Lucie Brunet, Mathieu Gallay, Bernard Oriola, Malika Auvray, Philippe Truillet, Michel Denis, Simon Thorpe, and Christophe Jouffrais. 2012. NAVIG: augmented reality guidance system for the visually impaired. Technology and Disability 24 (11 2012), 163-178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-012-0213-6 · DOI
  24. Sulaiman Khan, Shah Nazir, and Habib Ullah Khan. 2021. Analysis of Navigation Assistants for Blind and Visually Impaired People: A Systematic Review. IEEE Access 9 (2021), 26712-26734. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3052415 · DOI
  25. Andrew J. King. 2014. What happens to your hearing if you are born blind? Brain 137, 1 (01 2014), 6-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awt346 arXiv:https://academic.oup.com/brain/article-pdf/137/1/6/11141097/awt346.pdf · DOI
  26. Hicham Lahdili, Zine El, and Abidine Ismaili. 2019. Micro navigation system for smart parking area. Int. J. Intelligent Enterprise 6 (2019), 25-27. Issue 4.
  27. Young Hoon Lee and Gérard Medioni. 2015. Wearable RGBD Indoor Naviga- tion System for the Blind. In Computer Vision -ECCV 2014 Workshops, Lourdes Agapito, Michael M. Bronstein, and Carsten Rother (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 493-508.
  28. Laura Lewis, Sarah Sharples, Ed Chandler, and John Worsfold. 2015. Hearing the way: Requirements and preferences for technology-supported navigation aids. Applied Ergonomics 48 (2015), 56-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2014.11.004 · DOI
  29. Yang Liu, Noelle RB Stiles, and Markus Meister. 2018. Augmented reality powers a cognitive assistant for the blind. eLife 7 (nov 2018), e37841. https://doi.org/10. 7554/eLife.37841 · DOI
  30. Jacobus C. Lock, Iain D. Gilchrist, Iain D. Gilchrist, Grzegorz Cielniak, and Nicola Bellotto. 2020. Experimental Analysis of a Spatialised Audio Interface for People with Visual Impairments. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 13, 4, Article 17 (oct 2020), 21 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3412325 · DOI
  31. Alexander Marquardt, Christina Trepkowski, Tom David Eibich, Jens Maiero, Ernst Kruijff, and Johannes Schoning. 2020. Comparing Non-Visual and Visual Guidance Methods for Narrow Field of View Augmented Reality Displays. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 26 (12 2020), 3389-3401. Issue 12. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2020.3023605 · DOI
  32. Sergio Mascetti, Andrea Gerino, Cristian Bernareggi, and Lorenzo Picinali. 2017. On the Evaluation of Novel Sonification Techniques for Non-Visual Shape Ex- ploration. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 9, 4, Article 13 (April 2017), 28 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3046789 · DOI
  33. Dario Di Mauro, Davide Maria Calandra, Francesco Cutugno, and Daniela D'auria. 2015. A 3D Audio Augmented Reality System for a Cultural Heritage Management and Fruition. Journal of Digital Information Management 13 (2015). https: //doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2171.9520 · DOI
  34. Keenan R. May, Briana Sobel, Jeff Wilson, and Bruce N. Walker. 2019. Auditory Displays to Facilitate Object Targeting in 3D Space. In In Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Auditory display. International Community for Auditory Display, 155-162. https://doi.org/10.21785/icad2019.008 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Keenan R. May, Brianna J. Tomlinson, Xiaomeng Ma, Phillip Roberts, and Bruce N. Walker. 2020. Spotlights and Soundscapes: On the Design of Mixed Reality Auditory Environments for Persons with Visual Impairment. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 13, 2, Article 8 (April 2020), 47 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3378576 · DOI
  36. Mohammadreza Mirzaei, Peter Kán, and Hannes Kaufmann. 2021. Multi-modal Spatial Object Localization in Virtual Reality for Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing People. In 2021 IEEE Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). 588-596. https: //doi.org/10.1109/VR50410.2021.00084 · DOI
  37. Rabia Murtza, Stephen Monroe, and Robert J. Youmans. 2017. Heuristic Eval- uation for Virtual Reality Systems. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Er- gonomics Society Annual Meeting 61, 1 (2017), 2067-2071. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1541931213602000 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213602000 · DOI
  38. John G. Neuhoff. 2019. Is Sonification Doomed to Fail?. In In Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Auditory display. International Community for Auditory Display, 327-330. https://doi.org/10.21785/icad2019.069 · DOI
  39. John G. Neuhoff, Rebecca Knight, and Joseph Wayand. 2002. Pitch change, sonification and musical expertise: which way is up. In In Proceedings of the 2002 International Conference on Auditory display.
  40. Samuel Paré, Maxime Bleau, Ismaël Djerourou, Vincent Malotaux, Ron Kupers, and Maurice Ptito. 2021. Spatial navigation with horizontally spatialized sounds in early and late blind individuals. PLoS ONE 16 (02 2021). https://doi.org/10. 1371/journal.pone.0247448 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Giorgio Presti, Dragan Ahmetovic, Mattia Ducci, Cristian Bernareggi, Luca Lu- dovico, Adriano Baratè, Federico Avanzini, and Sergio Mascetti. 2019. WatchOut: Obstacle Sonification for People with Visual Impairment or Blindness. In The 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Pittsburgh, PA, USA) (ASSETS '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 402-413. https://doi.org/10.1145/3308561.3353779 · DOI
  42. Emmanouel Rovithis, Nikolaos Moustakas, Andreas Floros, and Kostas Vogklis. 2019. Audio legends: Investigating sonic interaction in an augmented reality audio game. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 3 (12 2019). Issue 4. https: //doi.org/10.3390/mti3040073 · DOI
  43. Sonja Rümelin, Enrico Rukzio, and Robert Hardy. 2011. NaviRadar: A Novel Tactile Information Display for Pedestrian Navigation. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Santa Barbara, California, USA) (UIST '11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 293-302. https://doi.org/10.1145/2047196.2047234 · DOI
  44. Ane San Martín and Johan Kildal. 2019. Audio-Visual AR to Improve Awareness of Hazard Zones Around Robots. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI EA '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1-6. https://doi. org/10.1145/3290607.3312996 · DOI
  45. Daisuke Sato, Uran Oh, João Guerreiro, Dragan Ahmetovic, Kakuya Naito, Hironobu Takagi, Kris M. Kitani, and Chieko Asakawa. 2019. NavCog3 in the Wild: Large-Scale Blind Indoor Navigation Assistant with Semantic Fea- tures. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 12, 3, Article 14 (Aug. 2019), 30 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3340319 · DOI
  46. Quan Shi. 2018. Crowdsourcing based micro navigation system for visually impaired. Master's thesis.
  47. Marjan Sikora, Mladen Russo, Jurica Derek, and Ante Jurčević. 2018. Soundscape of an archaeological site recreated with audio augmented reality. ACM Trans- actions on Multimedia Computing, Communications and Applications 14 (8 2018). Issue 3. https://doi.org/10.1145/3230652 · DOI
  48. Alexander Skulmowski and Günter Daniel Rey. 2017. Measuring Cognitive Load in Embodied Learning Settings. Frontiers in Psychology 8 (2017), 1191. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01191 · DOI
  49. Romin W. Tafarodi, Alan B. Milne, and Alyson J. Smith. 1999. The Confidence of Choice: Evidence for an Augmentation Effect on Self-Perceived Performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 25, 11 (1999), 1405-1416. https://doi. org/10.1177/0146167299259006 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167299259006 · DOI
  50. Lauren Thevin, Carine Briant, and Anke M. Brock. 2020. X-Road: Virtual Reality Glasses for Orientation and Mobility Training of People with Visual Impairments. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 13, 2, Article 7 (April 2020), 47 pages. https://doi. org/10.1145/3377879 · DOI
  51. Lauren Thevin and Tonja Machulla. 2020. Three Common Misconceptions about Visual Impairments. Proceedings -2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces, VRW 2020, 517-518. https://doi.org/10.1109/VRW50115.2020. 00110 · DOI
  52. Patricia A Tun, Sandra McCoy, and Arthur Wingfield. 2009. Aging, Hearing Acuity, and the Attentional Costs of Effortful Listening. Psychology and Aging (09 2009), 761-766. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014802 · DOI
  53. Christoph Urbanietz, Gerald Enzner, Alexander Orth, Patrick Kwiatkowski, and Nils Pohl. 2019. A Radar-based Navigation Assistance Device With Binaural Sound Interface for Vision-impaired People. In In Proceedings of the 2019 Interna- tional Conference on Auditory display. 236-243. https://doi.org/10.21785/icad2019. 023 · DOI
  54. Vincent van Rheden, Thomas Grah, and Alexander Meschtscherjakov. 2020. Sonification Approaches in Sports in the Past Decade: A Literature Review. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Audio Mostly (Graz, Austria) (AM '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 199-205. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411109.3411126 · DOI
  55. Yolanda Vazquez-Alvarez, Ian Oakley, and Stephen A. Brewster. 2012. Auditory display design for exploration in mobile audio-augmented reality. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 16 (12 2012), 987-999. Issue 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00779-011-0459-0 · DOI
  56. Zhiquan Wang, Huimin Liu, Yucong Pan, and Christos Mousas. 2020. Ex- periencing and Navigating Virtual Reality without Sight. Proceedings -2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces, VRW 2020, 519-520. https://doi.org/10.1109/VRW50115.2020.00114 · DOI
  57. Frederic L Wightman and Doris J Kistler. 1999. Resolution of front-back ambiguity in spatial hearing by listener and source movement. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 105 (apr 1999). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.426899 · DOI
  58. Michele A. Williams, Caroline Galbraith, Shaun K. Kane, and Amy Hurst. 2014. "just Let the Cane Hit It": How the Blind and Sighted See Navigation Dif- ferently. In Proceedings of the 16th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility (Rochester, New York, USA) (ASSETS '14). As- sociation for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 217-224. https: //doi.org/10.1145/2661334.2661380 · DOI · Paper page
  59. Haojie Wu, Daniel H. Ashmead, Haley Adams, and Bobby Bodenheimer. 2018. 3D Sound Rendering in a Virtual Environment to Evaluate Pedestrian Street Crossing Decisions at a Roundabout. In 2018 IEEE 4th VR Workshop on Sonic Interactions for Virtual Environments (SIVE). 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/SIVE.2018.8577195 · DOI
  60. Wenjie Wu and Stefan Rank. 2015. Audio Feedback Design Principles for Hand Gestures in Audio-Only Games. In Proceedings of the Audio Mostly 2015 on Inter- action With Sound (Thessaloniki, Greece) (AM '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 38, 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 2814895.2814925 · DOI
  61. A. T. Zijlstra. 2017. Using the HoloLens' Spatial Sound System to aid the Visually Impaired when Navigating Indoors. Master's thesis.
  62. Michael Zöllner, Stephan Huber, Hans-Christian Jetter, and Harald Reiterer. 2011. NAVI -A Proof-of-Concept of a Mobile Navigational Aid for Visually Impaired Based on the Microsoft Kinect. In Human-Computer Interaction -INTERACT 2011, Pedro Campos, Nicholas Graham, Joaquim Jorge, Nuno Nunes, Philippe Palanque, and Marco Winckler (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 584- 587.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guarese, R., Zambetta, F., & van Schyndel, R.
Affiliations
  • RMIT University (AU)
  • RMIT University, Australia
ORCID
Venue
Proceedings of the 34th Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction
Publisher
ACM
Published
2022-11-29
Pages
260-271
DOI
10.1145/3572921.3572929
OpenAlex
W4362682698
Cited by
14
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3
FWCI
5.07
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.acm.org/publications/policies/copyright_policy#Background (vor)
Locations
Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (OzCHI) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
Keywords
sonification, blind and visually impaired users, spatial audio, mixed reality, virtual reality, audio feedback, music literacy, alternation, spatiality, assistive technology, user evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review