Cited by 38Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningUltrasound in Clinical Applications

Self-Supervised Contrastive Video-Speech Representation Learning for Ultrasound

Open access
Jiao, Jianbo, Cai, Yifan, Alsharid, Mohammad, Drukker, Lior, Papageorghiou, Aris T., Noble, J. Alison·2020·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Abstract

In medical imaging, manual annotations can be expensive to acquire and sometimes infeasible to access, making conventional deep learning-based models difficult to scale. As a result, it would be beneficial if useful representations could be derived from raw data without the need for manual annotations. In this paper, we propose to address the problem of self-supervised representation learning with multi-modal ultrasound video-speech raw data. For this case, we assume that there is a high correlation between the ultrasound video and the corresponding narrative speech audio of the sonographer. In order to learn meaningful representations, the model needs to identify such correlation and at the same time understand the underlying anatomical features. We designed a framework to model the correspondence between video and audio without any kind of human annotations. Within this framework, we introduce cross-modal contrastive learning and an affinity-aware self-paced learning scheme to enhance correlation modelling. Experimental evaluations on multi-modal fetal ultrasound video and audio show that the proposed approach is able to learn strong representations and transfers well to downstream tasks of standard plane detection and eye-gaze prediction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-59716-0_51

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The innate relationship tasks in combined studies range from augmentation prediction and patch positioning prediction, rotation prediction, and ultrasound video to speech correspondence prediction.

    “The innate relationship tasks range from augmentation prediction and patch positioning prediction69, rotation prediction70, and ultrasound video to speech correspondence prediction53.”
  • Jiao et al. leveraged the correlation between fetal ultrasonography and the narrative speech of the sonographer to create a pre-text task for self-supervision, and subsequently used the learned representations for downstream standard plane classification on sonograms.

    “Jiao et al. cleverly leveraged the correlation between fetal ultrasonography and the narrative speech of the sonographer to create a pre-text task for self-supervision, and subsequently used the learned representations for downstream standard plane classification on sonograms53.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 18 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [4]Chen T Kornblith S Norouzi M Hinton G A simple framework for contrastive learning of visual representations ICML 2020
  2. [6]He K Fan H Wu Y Xie S Girshick R Momentum contrast for unsupervised visual representation learning CVPR 2020
  3. [7]Hénaff OJ Srinivas A De Fauw J Razavi A Doersch C Eslami S Oord Avd Data-efficient image recognition with contrastive predictive coding 2019 arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.09272 · arXiv
  4. [11]Oord Avd Li Y Vinyals O Representation learning with contrastive predictive coding 2018 arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.03748 · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jiao, J., Cai, Y., Alsharid, M., Drukker, L., Papageorghiou, A. T., & Noble, J. A.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Jiao, Jianbo
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2020
Volume
12263
Pages
534-543
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W3094123278
Cited by
38
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4
FWCI
2.14
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Nvidia
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/M013774/1, EP/M013774/)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
Keywords
self-supervised representation learning, contrastive learning, ultrasound video, cross-modal learning, prenatal ultrasound, annotation-free learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review