Cited by 506Spam and Phishing DetectionMisinformation and Its ImpactsHate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection

Deep neural networks for bot detection

Open access
Kudugunta, Sneha, Ferrara, Emilio·2018·Information Sciences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ins.2018.08.019

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Content posted by bots provides essential clues for bot detection.

    “Content posted by bots also provides essential clues (Kudugunta and Ferrara, 2018;Heidari and Jones, 2020).”

    From Anatomy of an AI-powered malicious social botnet (2024) · cites this paper as Kudugunta and Ferrara, 2018

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kudugunta, S., & Ferrara, E.
Affiliations
  • Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad (IN)
  • University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Ferrara, Emilio
Venue
Information Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-10
Volume
467
Pages
312-322
ISSN
0020-0255 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2787296320
Cited by
506
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 81 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 80 · 2020: 79 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 6
FWCI
80.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Information Sciences (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (911NF-17-C-0094)
  • Air Force Office of Scientific Research (9550-17-1-0327)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Keywords
bot detection, social bots, Twitter, user metadata, synthetic minority oversampling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review