Cited by 9Network Security and Intrusion DetectionInformation and Cyber SecurityPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data

Contrastive Learning for Insider Threat Detection

Vinay, M. S., Yuan, Shuhan, Wu, Xintao·2022·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-031-00123-9_32

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 12 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vinay, M. S., Yuan, S., & Wu, X.
Affiliations
  • University of Arkansas at Fayetteville (US)
  • Utah State University (US)
Corresponding author
Wu, Xintao
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2022
Pages
395-403
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W4226412712
Cited by
9
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3
FWCI
1.94
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Keywords
insider threat detection, contrastive learning, audit data, class imbalance, malicious insiders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review