Cited by 1Ancient Egypt and ArchaeologyHistorical Astronomy and Related StudiesHistorical and Architectural Studies

Astronomy and chronology.

Belmonte, Juan Antonio, Lull, José·2023·Historical & Cultural Astronomy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-031-11829-6_7

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The correctness of the High and Low chronologies has been actively debated for more than a century.

    “The correctness of these two alternatives, High and Low, has been actively debated for more than a century [1,26,29,30,34,35].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Belmonte, J. A., & Lull, J.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de La Laguna (ES)
  • Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
Corresponding author
Belmonte, Juan Antonio
Venue
Historical & Cultural Astronomy
Published
2023
Pages
467-529
ISSN
  • 2509-310X (ISSN-L)
  • 2509-3118
OpenAlex
W4362513745
Cited by
1
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 1
FWCI
3.96
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Historical & cultural astronomy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Historical Astronomy and Related Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Historical and Architectural Studies
Keywords
chronology of ancient Egypt, astronomical dating, radiocarbon dating, Egyptian chronology, ancient Egyptian history, dating methods

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review