Contributions to the Chronology of the New Kingdom and the Third Intermediate Period
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
An alternative NK model with revised reign lengths and plausible longest reigns for the 18th Dynasty offers a different and much smaller ΔR of ~6 ± 6 14C years.
“We find that an alternative NK model33 which employs some revised reign lengths and the plausible longest reigns for the 18th Dynasty (ultra-high model)34–36, and so has a slightly different placement of the constituent groups of 14C data versus the calibration curve, offers a different (and much smaller) ΔR of ~ 6 ± 6 14C years (Supplementary Fig. S5).”
From Radiocarbon offsets and old world chronology as relevant to Mesopotamia, Egypt, Anatolia and Thera (Santorini) (2020) · cites this paper as [35]
There is limited overlap with the 14C-based estimate for the accession year of Siamun (1019-977 BC, 95.4% hpd) and none with traditional estimates for his reign (978-959 BC or 995-976 BC).
“There is limited overlap with the 14C-based estimate for the accession year of Siamun (1019–977 BC, 95.4% hpd) and none with traditional estimates for his reign (978–959 BC [146] or 995–976 BC [145]).”
From The chronology of Gezer from the end of the late bronze age to iron age II: A meeting point for radiocarbon, archaeology egyptology and the Bible (2023) · cites this paper as [145]
The traditional Egyptian chronology puts Sheshonq I's reign at 945-924 BC or 962-941 BC.
“(The traditional Egyptian chronology puts Sheshonq I’s reign at 945–924 BC [146] or 962–941 BC [145].)”
From The chronology of Gezer from the end of the late bronze age to iron age II: A meeting point for radiocarbon, archaeology egyptology and the Bible (2023) · cites this paper as [145]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Crisis in Context: The End of the Late Bronze Age in the Eastern Mediterranean
Knapp, A. B., & Manning, S. W. (2016) · American Journal of Archaeology · doi:10.3764/aja.120.1.0099 · Cited by 292 · see citing works
“…and brigands—whose accompanying ships are depicted only once in any detail, in reliefs on the outer walls of the Ramesside temple at Medinet Habu.305 These ships look suspiciously similar to the smaller- 301 E.g., Schneider 2010; Huber 2011; Aston 2012–2013; Ritner and Moeller 2014; Wiener 2014.”
BackgroundInfluentialSevere multi-year drought coincident with Hittite collapse around 1198–1196 bc
Manning, S. W., Kocik, C., Lorentzen, B., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05693-y · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Manning, S. W., Höflmayer, F., Moeller, N., Dee, M. W., Ramsey, C. B., Fleitmann, D., Higham, T., Kutschera, W., & Wild, E. M. (2014) · Antiquity · doi:10.1017/s0003598x00115388 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Ben-Yosef, E., Liss, B., Yagel, O. A., Tirosh, O., Najjar, M., & Levy, T. E. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0221967 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Manning, S. W., Wacker, L., Büntgen, U., Bronk Ramsey, C., Dee, M. W., Kromer, B., Lorentzen, B., & Tegel, W. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-69287-2 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
The Amorites and the Bronze Age Near East
Burke, A. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108856461 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Radiocarbon dating the Late Bronze Age: Cultural and Historical Considerations on Megiddo and Beyond
Martin, M. A. S., Finkelstein, I., & Piasetzky, E. (2020) · Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research · doi:10.1086/709576 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
“High New Kingdom chronologies have been proposed more recently, with the beginning of the 18th Dynasty at 1548 (Schneider 2010), 1565, or even 1576 B.C.E. (cf. Aston 2012), as opposed to the conventional low 1540 B.C.E. (Kitchen 2000).”
BackgroundEvian, S. B., Yagel, O. A., Harlavan, Y., Seri, H., Lewinsky, J., & Ben‐Yosef, E. (2021) · Journal of Archaeological Science Reports · doi:10.1016/j.jasrep.2021.103025 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Webster, L. C., Wolff, S. R., Ortiz, S. M., Barbosa, M., Coyle, C., Arbino, G. P., Dee, M. W., Hua, Q., & Jacobsen, G. E. (2023) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0293119 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Finkelstein, I., Arie, E., Martin, M. A. S., & Piasetzky, E. I. (2017) · Ägypten und Levante · doi:10.1553/aeundl27s261 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Climate, Settlement History, and Olive Cultivation in the Iron Age Southern Levant
Finkelstein, I., & Langgut, D. (2018) · Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research · doi:10.5615/bullamerschoorie.379.0153 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
“The date of his reign suggested by Thomas Schneider (2010)—962–941 b.c.e—fits the above scenario better than the one advocated by Kenneth Kitchen (1986)—945–924 b.c.e.—as it opens the way to associate this pharaoh with the late Iron Age I sites.”
BackgroundKleiman, S., Kleiman, A., & Ben-Yosef, E. (2017) · Tel Aviv · doi:10.1080/03344355.2017.1357313 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Radiocarbon, Wine Jars and New Kingdom Chronology
Aston, D. (2014) · Ägypten und Levante · doi:10.1553/s289 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“S CHNEIDER 2010 in the above table), yet a 1479–1290 correlation would still ‘fit’ within the two sigma range.”
Ramesses III and the ‘Sea‐peoples’: Towards a New Philistine Paradigm
Evian, S. B. (2017) · Oxford Journal of Archaeology · doi:10.1111/ojoa.12115 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
“Therefore, the initial Philistine settlement should be down-dated to c.1140 BCE – that is, after the Egyptian withdrawal from Canaan (the end of Ramesses VI’s rule according to the revised chronology by Schneider 2010, 403).”
BackgroundThe Astronomical Basis of Egyptian Chronology of the Second Millennium BC
Huber, P. J. (2011) · Journal of Egyptian History · doi:10.1163/187416611x618721 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Bietak, M. (2015) · Quantitative Methods in the Humanities and Social Sciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-04768-3_2 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Asscher, Y., Martin, M. A. S., Master, D., & Boaretto, E. (2021) · Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research · doi:10.1086/714738 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“…could only be used as a terminus post quem for Phase 20B, we chose the earliest proposed accession date of Ramesses III, 1195 B.C.E. (Schneider 2010), to constrain the models, although later options are available in the literature: 1184 (Kitchen 1991; Shaw 2003) and 1187 B.C.E. (Krauss 2007).”
MethodThe Sheshonq Fragment from Megiddo: A New Interpretation
Evian, S. B., & Finkelstein, I. (2023) · Bulletin of the American Society of Overseas Research · doi:10.1086/727430 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Dating the Emergence of Historical Israel in Light of Recent Developments in Egyptian Chronology
Wiener, M. H. (2014) · Tel Aviv · doi:10.1179/0334435514z.00000000035 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“My proposed revised Egyptian chronology would require raising the date of the accession of Ramesses II to 1290 BCE (Wiener 2010; Schneider 2010; Wiener forthcoming) in accordance with the nearest appropriate Egyptian astronomical date.”
BackgroundTree Rings and the Chronology of Ancient Egypt
Creasman, P. P. (2014) · Radiocarbon · doi:10.1017/s0033822200050396 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
The Political History of Megiddo in the Early Iron Age and the Ambiguities of Evidence
Thomas, Z. (2021) · Journal of Ancient Near Eastern History · doi:10.1515/janeh-2020-0020 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Radiocarbon Dating and Egyptian Chronology—From the “Curve of Knowns” to Bayesian Modeling
Höflmayer, F. (2016) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935413.013.64 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Reassessment of Absolute Chronology of the Egyptian New Kingdom and its ´Brotherly´ Countries
Gautschy, R. (2012) · Ägypten und Levante · doi:10.1553/s141 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Jin, M., Lipschits, O., & Langgut, D. (2023) · Oxford Journal of Archaeology · doi:10.1111/ojoa.12287 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
The Date of Appearance of Philistine Pottery at Megiddo: A Computational Approach
Levy, E., Finkelstein, I., Martin, M. A. S., & Piasetzky, E. I. (2022) · Bulletin of the American Society of Overseas Research · doi:10.1086/719048 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
The Collapse of the Hittite Kingdom
Martino, S. D. (2022) · Universal- und kulturhistorische Studien · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-36876-0_4 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
New Radiocarbon Dating from Late Bronze and Iron Age Gezer and Its Implications
Webster, L. C., Wolff, S. R., & Ortiz, S. M. (2024) · Journal of Eastern Mediterranean Archaeology & Heritage Studies · doi:10.5325/jeasmedarcherstu.12.4.0411 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Fischer, P. M., & Manolova, T. (2025) · Oxford Journal of Archaeology · doi:10.1111/ojoa.12325 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“…material for fishing gear during the Late Bronze Age, the basic forms exhibit minimal changes throughout different periods, highlighting that there was little to no need for 7 1348 – 1331 BC (e,g. Schneider 2010); the radiocarbon dates of samples from the reign of Amenhotep IV (Bronk Ramsey et al .”
Bruins, H. J., & van der Plicht, J. (2025) · PLOS One · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0330702 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Table 2 shows the following historical dating options for year 22 of Ahmose, when the mudbricks for his Temple were probably made: 1558 BCE [88], 1548 BCE [129], 1528 BCE [75], 1526 BCE [130], 1517 BCE [76].”
Eski Mısır’da Asur Hakimiyetinin Başlangıcı ve Sonrasında Oluşturulan İdari Organizasyon
YILDIRIM, E. (2023) · Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi · doi:10.51533/insanbilimleri.1199409 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Assyrian Chronology and Ideology of Kingship: The Impact on Biblical Historiography and Religion
Derstine, P. (2024) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel15070804 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Pre‐Excavation Identification and Dating of Iron Age Destruction Events
Vaknin, Y., Granot, R., Shalom, N., Buzaglo‐Yoresh, E., Keidar‐Goldberg, A., & Münger, S. (2025) · Archaeological Prospection · doi:10.1002/arp.70003 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“…is an ongoing debate regarding the precise dating of Shoshenq's campaign, but it must have occurred sometime between 962 and 920 bce (Kitchen 1986; Schneider 2010), a date range which may fit our archaeomagnetic dating results for Tel Nisa and Tel Zofim (the 68.2% date range of option B is…”
InfluentialLa figura regia de Hatshepsut: una propuesta de análisis a partir de tres cambios ontológicos
Laporta, V. (2012) · LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Belmonte, J. A., & Lull, J. (2023) · Historical & Cultural Astronomy · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-11829-6_7 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Burke, A. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108856461.006
Burke, A. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108856461.007
Burke, A. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108856461.004
Broekman, G. P. F. (2012) · Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)
Burke, A. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108856461.008
Burke, A. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108856461.005
Burke, A. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108856461.003
Burke, A. A. (2020) · doi:10.1017/9781108856461.001
Burke, A. A. (2020) · doi:10.1017/9781108856461.002
(2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108856461.009
Burke, A. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108856461.010
Time and Paradigm at Tel Megiddo: David, Shoshenq I, Hazael and Radiocarbon Dating
Bruins, H. J. (2023) · Interdisciplinary Contributions to Archaeology/Interdisciplinary contributions to archaeology · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-27330-8_35
Evian, S. B. (2024) · Journal of Eastern Mediterranean Archaeology & Heritage Studies · doi:10.5325/jeasmedarcherstu.12.4.0425
Reception: The Arsacids at Rome
Nabel, J. (2025) · University of California Press eBooks · doi:10.1525/luminos.227.d
Remission: The Emperor as Parthian Aristocrat
Nabel, J. (2025) · University of California Press eBooks · doi:10.1525/luminos.227.e
Return: The Parthian Kingships of the Arsacids of Rome
Nabel, J. (2025) · University of California Press eBooks · doi:10.1525/luminos.227.f
Submission I: The Fosterage Background
Nabel, J. (2025) · University of California Press eBooks · doi:10.1525/luminos.227.b
Nabel, J. (2025) · University of California Press eBooks · doi:10.1525/luminos.227.a
Submission II: Parthian Pragmatism
Nabel, J. (2025) · University of California Press eBooks · doi:10.1525/luminos.227.c
Nabel, J. (2025) · University of California Press eBooks · doi:10.1525/luminos.227.g
Eski Mısır’da Kralların Yönetiminden Tanrıların İdaresine Geçiş (III. Ara Dönem)
YILDIRIM, E. (2026) · Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi · doi:10.51290/dpusbe.1815119
- Authors
- Schneider, T.
- Corresponding author
- Schneider, Thomas
- ORCID
- Schneider, Thomas
- Venue
- Ägypten und Levante
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 20
- Pages
- 373-404
- ISSN
- 1015-5104 (ISSN-L)
- 1813-5145
- OpenAlex
- W151031832
- Semantic Scholar
- b6a332bc13e93a6c059dd9fb99361900895508af
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 20.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- de
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ägypten und Levante (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Classical Antiquity Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies
- Keywords
- chronology, New Kingdom, Third Intermediate Period, ancient Egyptian chronology, Egyptian history
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
