Cited by 6Embodied and Extended CognitionPosthumanist Ethics and ActivismCybernetics and Technology in Society

Systemic Cognition: Sketching a Functional Nexus of Intersecting Ontologies

Open access
Gahrn-Andersen, Rasmus, Festila, Maria S., Secchi, Davide·2024·Contributions to Management Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-031-44685-6_8

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gahrn-Andersen, R., Festila, M. S., & Secchi, D.
Affiliations
University of Southern Denmark (DK)
Corresponding author
Gahrn-Andersen, Rasmus
Venue
Contributions to Management Science
Published
2024
Pages
89-99
ISSN
  • 1431-1941 (ISSN-L)
  • 2197-716X
OpenAlex
W4390590824
Cited by
6
References
27
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 2
FWCI
4.71
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Locations
  • Contributions to management science (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
Keywords
practical ontology, human-nonhuman relations, affordances, habit, instinct, concepts, organizational cognition, systemic coherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review