CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 2Narrative Theory and AnalysisDigital Games and MediaArtificial Intelligence in Games

Interpretation as Play: A Cognitive Psychological Model of Inference and Situation Model Construction

Higgins, Matthew·2023·Lecture Notes in Computer Science
DOI 10.1007/978-3-031-47655-6_1
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-031-47655-6_1

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Muscat, A.: Mechanics & Materialities: WORLD4 and the Effort of Looking in Videogames. University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland (2020)
  2. Caillois, R.: Man, Play, and Games. Uiversity of Illinois Press, Illinois (1961)
  3. Howell, P.: A theoretical framework of ludic knowledge: a case study in disruption and cognitive engagement. In: 10th International Conference in the Philosophy of Computer Games, Valletta, Malta, October (2016)
  4. Pinchbeck, D., Stevens, B., Van Laar, S., Hand, S., Newman, K.: Narrative, agency and observational behaviour in a first person shooter environment. In: Proceedings of Narrative AI and Games Symposium: Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and the Simulation of Behaviour (AISOB’06), pp. 53–61. SSAISB (2006)
  5. Herman, D.: Story logic: Problems and Possibilities of Narrative. U of Nebraska Press (2004)
  6. Cardona-Rivera, R.E., Cassell, B.A., Ware, S.G., Young, R.M.: Indexter: a computational model of the event-indexing situation model for characterizing narratives. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Computational Models of Narrative, pp. 34–43 (2012)
  7. Johnson-Laird, P.N.: Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness. Harvard University Press (1983)
  8. Kintsch, W.: Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition. Cambridge University Press (1998)
  9. Pitkänen, J.: Studying thoughts: stimulated recall as a game research method. Game Research Methods, pp. 117–132 (2015)
  10. Pinchbeck, D.: Ambiguity and abstraction in game writing: lessons from dear esther. In: Game Developers Conference. (2012)
  11. Barlow, S.: Making her story - telling a story using the player’s imagination. In: Game Developers Conference (2016). [https://www.gdcvault.com/play/1023430/Making-Her-Story-Telling-a]
  12. Smith, P.: Hemingway’s early manuscripts: the theory and practice of omission. J. Mod. Lit. 10, 268–288 (1983)
  13. Mitchell, A.: Defamiliarization and poetic interaction in Kentucky route zero. Well Played J. 3, 161–178 (2014)

Cited by

Still being checked.

Related

Authors
Higgins, M.
Affiliations
University of Portsmouth (GB)
Corresponding author
Higgins, Matthew
ORCID
Higgins, Matthew
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Publisher
Springer Nature Switzerland
Published
2023
Pages
3-20
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
DOI
10.1007/978-3-031-47655-6_1
OpenAlex
W4388019308
Semantic Scholar
83c0cc4c51de5666e07b10e254ca5d207a98232c
Cited by
2
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1
FWCI
13.29
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Narrative Theory and Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Games and Media
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence in Games
Keywords
narrative interpretation, narrative comprehension, inference, discourse comprehension, video games, Gone Home, game narrative, interactive digital narratives, long-term memory, game design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review