Event Segmentation
Open accessAbstract
One way to understand something is to break it up into parts. New research indicates that segmenting ongoing activity into meaningful events is a core component of ongoing perception, with consequences for memory and learning. Behavioral and neuroimaging data suggest that event segmentation is automatic and that people spontaneously segment activity into hierarchically organized parts and sub-parts. This segmentation depends on the bottom-up processing of sensory features such as movement, and on the top-down processing of conceptual features such as actors' goals. How people segment activity affects what they remember later; as a result, those who identify appropriate event boundaries during perception tend to remember more and learn more proficiently.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Event Segmentation Theory holds that segmentation is automatic, operates at multiple scales, and is triggered by salient changes in time, space, objects or characters, goals, or causality.
“Event Segmentation Theory (EST) [52] holds that segmentation is automatic [53], operates at multiple scales [6], and is triggered by salient changes in time, space, objects or characters, goals, or causality [6].”
From HingeMem: Boundary Guided Long-Term Memory with Query Adaptive Retrieval for Scalable Dialogues (2026) · cites this paper as [52]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Event boundaries in perception affect memory encoding and updating
Swallow, K. M., Zacks, J. M., & Abrams, R. A. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/a0015631 · Cited by 382 · see citing works
Self-citationEvent memory: A theory of memory for laboratory, autobiographical, and fictional events.
Rubin, D. C., & Umanath, S. (2015) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0037907 · Cited by 379 · see citing works
The Psychology of Rituals: An Integrative Review and Process-Based Framework
Hobson, N. M., Schroeder, J., Risen, J. L., Xygalatas, D., & Inzlicht, M. (2018) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868317734944 · Cited by 354 · see citing works
The human brain uses spatial schemas to represent segmented environments
Peer, M., & Epstein, R. A. (2021) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2021.08.012 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Kwok, S. C., Xu, X., Duan, W., Wang, X., Tang, Y., Allé, M. C., & Berna, F. (2021) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101956 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Higgins, M. (2023) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-47655-6_1 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
HingeMem: Boundary Guided Long-Term Memory with Query Adaptive Retrieval for Scalable Dialogues
Zhong, Y., Gao, Y., & Wang, H. (2026) · Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2026 · doi:10.1145/3774904.3792089 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zacks, J. M., & Swallow, K. M.
- Affiliations
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Corresponding author
- Zacks, Jeffrey M.
- Venue
- Current Directions in Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2007-04
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 80-84
- ISSN
- 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8721
- PMC
- PMC3314399
- OpenAlex
- W4234344023
- Cited by
- 433
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 51 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 28
- FWCI
- 1.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH070674)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- event segmentation, memory, learning, automatic segmentation, hierarchy, bottom-up processing, top-down processing, movement, event boundaries
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review