Cited by 433Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsCognitive Functions and Memory

Event Segmentation

Open access
Zacks, Jeffrey M., Swallow, Khena M.·2007·Current Directions in Psychological Science

Abstract

One way to understand something is to break it up into parts. New research indicates that segmenting ongoing activity into meaningful events is a core component of ongoing perception, with consequences for memory and learning. Behavioral and neuroimaging data suggest that event segmentation is automatic and that people spontaneously segment activity into hierarchically organized parts and sub-parts. This segmentation depends on the bottom-up processing of sensory features such as movement, and on the top-down processing of conceptual features such as actors' goals. How people segment activity affects what they remember later; as a result, those who identify appropriate event boundaries during perception tend to remember more and learn more proficiently.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00480.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Event Segmentation Theory holds that segmentation is automatic, operates at multiple scales, and is triggered by salient changes in time, space, objects or characters, goals, or causality.

    “Event Segmentation Theory (EST) [52] holds that segmentation is automatic [53], operates at multiple scales [6], and is triggered by salient changes in time, space, objects or characters, goals, or causality [6].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zacks, J. M., & Swallow, K. M.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
Zacks, Jeffrey M.
Venue
Current Directions in Psychological Science
Published
2007-04
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
80-84
ISSN
  • 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8721
OpenAlex
W4234344023
Cited by
433
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 51 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 28
FWCI
1.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH070674)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
event segmentation, memory, learning, automatic segmentation, hierarchy, bottom-up processing, top-down processing, movement, event boundaries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review