Emergent Narrative and Reparative Play
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Aarseth, E. (1997) · doi:10.56021/9780801855788 · Cited by 1,313 · see citing works
Truth and Consequences: On Paranoid Reading and Reparative Reading
Love, H. K. (2010) · Criticism · doi:10.1353/crt.2010.0022 · Cited by 298 · see citing works
(2003) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctv11smq37.9 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Towards a Specific Theory of Interactive Digital Narrative
Koenitz, H. (2015) · Interactive Digital Narrative · doi:10.4324/9781315769189-8 · Cited by 126 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The idea is analogous to the SPP model’s protostory , which “describes the concrete content of an IDN system as a space of potential narratives” [6].”
BackgroundMethodLudonarrative Hermeneutics: A Way Out and the Narrative Paradox
Roth, C., van Nuenen, T., & Koenitz, H. (2018) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-04028-4_7 · Cited by 64 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Recent work on ludonarrative hermeneutics [12, 10] has attempted to address the question of how players make sense of narrative meaning in interactive digital narrative (IDN) systems, including narrative games.”
BackgroundRe-Tellings: The Fourth Layer of Narrative as an Instrument for Critique
Eladhari, M. P. (2018) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-04028-4_5 · Cited by 60 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Player-authors of Sims retellings [3] often attempt to attribute a meaning to the game’s abstract dialogue icons in order to shore up an interpretation.”
BackgroundEvaluating AI-Based Games through Retellings
Kreminski, M., Samuel, B., Melcer, E., & Wardrip-Fruin, N. (2019) · Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment Conference · doi:10.1609/aiide.v15i1.5223 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Self-citationOhito, E. O. (2016) · Curriculum Inquiry · doi:10.1080/03626784.2016.1236658 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
“Reparative Reading” as Queer Pedagogy
Hawthorne, S. M. (2018) · Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion · doi:10.2979/jfemistudreli.34.1.24 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Rezk, A. M., & Haahr, M. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-62516-0_16 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Emergent Narratives and Story Volumes
Grinblat, J. (2017) · A K Peters/CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781315156378-22 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Eco, U.: The Open Work. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1989)
- Ruberg, B., Shaw, A.: Queer Game Studies. U of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis (2017)
- Ryan, J.: Curating Simulated Storyworlds. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Santa Cruz (2018)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Higgins, M. (2023) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-47655-6_1 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Grinblat, J., Manning, C., & Kreminski, M.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kreminski, Max
- ORCID
- Kreminski, Max
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2021
- Pages
- 208-216
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W4206620517
- Semantic Scholar
- c3ad3313876a6cfce62626291722671a464c9a01
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 4.15
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Games and Media
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Narrative Theory and Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence in Games
- Keywords
- Eve Sedgwick, reparative reading, paranoid reading, interactive digital narratives, emergent narrative, play, meaning-making, multiplicity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
