Cited by 6Academic integrity and plagiarismCorruption and Economic DevelopmentBenford’s Law and Fraud Detection

Prevalence, Incidence, and Rates of Contract Cheating

Curtis, Guy J., Clare, Joseph·2024·Springer International Handbooks of Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-031-54144-5_110

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Complex cases of fraud, such as contract cheating, continue to create unequal opportunities and outcomes.

    “complex cases of fraud, such as contract cheating, continue to create unequal opportunities and outcomes (Curtis & Clare, 2024; Daly & Ryan, 2024)”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Curtis, G. J., & Clare, J.
Affiliations
The University of Western Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Curtis, Guy J.
Venue
Springer International Handbooks of Education
Published
2024
Pages
681-696
ISSN
  • 2197-1951 (ISSN-L)
  • 2197-196X
OpenAlex
W4391981611
Cited by
6
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2
FWCI
8.50
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer international handbooks of education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Corruption and Economic Development
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Benford’s Law and Fraud Detection
Keywords
contract cheating, academic integrity, prevalence, incidence, higher education, academic dishonesty, data sources, research methodology critique

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review