CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 250Interdisciplinary Research and CollaborationResearch, Science, and AcademiaUniversity-Industry-Government Innovation Models

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Potential of Transdisciplinarity

Gibbons, Michael, Nowotny, Helga·2001·Transdisciplinarity: Joint Problem Solving among Science, Technology, and Society
DOI 10.1007/978-3-0348-8419-8_7
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

A transformation is occurring in the relationship of science and society. A new mode of knowledge production is at the heart of this transformation. Much of the thrust of innovation is coming from new links between traditionally segmented producers and users of knowledge. Contextualization of research around the interests of stakeholders fosters a more “socially robust” knowledge that transgresses disciplinary and institutional boundaries. The ancient Greek agora is a model for a new transdisciplinary forum. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-0348-8419-8_7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–245 of 245

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Gibbons, M., & Nowotny, H.
Affiliations
  • Association of Commonwealth Universities (GB)
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
ORCID
Venue
Transdisciplinarity: Joint Problem Solving among Science, Technology, and Society
Publisher
Birkhäuser Basel
Published
2001
Pages
67-80
DOI
10.1007/978-3-0348-8419-8_7
OpenAlex
W129870078
Cited by
250
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 13
FWCI
30.13
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Birkhäuser Basel eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Research, Science, and Academia
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
Keywords
transdisciplinarity, science and society, knowledge production, stakeholder engagement, interdisciplinary research, institutional boundaries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review