Cited by 24Spatial Cognition and NavigationGeographic Information Systems StudiesGeography Education and Pedagogy

How does the design of landmarks on a mobile map influence wayfinding experts’ spatial learning during a real-world navigation task?

Open access
Kapaj, Armand, Lanini-Maggi, Sara, Hilton, Christopher, Cheng, Bingjie, Fabrikant, Sara I.·2023·Cartography and Geographic Information Science

Abstract

Humans increasingly rely on GPS-enabled mobile maps to navigate novel environments. However, this reliance can negatively affect spatial learning, which can be detrimental even for expert navigators such as search and rescue personnel. Landmark visualization has been shown to improve spatial learning in general populations by facilitating object identification between the map and the environment. How landmark visualization supports expert users’ spatial learning during map-assisted navigation is still an open research question. We thus conducted a real-world study with wayfinding experts in an unknown residential neighborhood. We aimed to assess how two different landmark visualization styles (abstract 2D vs. realistic 3D buildings) would affect experts’ spatial learning in a map-assisted navigation task during an emergency scenario. Using a between-subjects design, we asked Swiss military personnel to follow a given route using a mobile map, and to identify five task-relevant landmarks along the route. We recorded experts’ gaze behavior while navigating and examined their spatial learning after the navigation task. We found that experts’ spatial learning improved when they focused their visual attention on the environment, but the direction of attention between the map and the environment was not affected by the landmark visualization style. Further, there was no difference in spatial learning between the 2D and 3D groups. Contrary to previous research with general populations, this study suggests that the landmark visualization style does not enhance expert navigators’ navigation or spatial learning abilities, thus highlighting the need for population-specific mobile map design solutions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15230406.2023.2183525

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A-priori power analysis for a single-predictor multilevel linear regression model using parameters from a previous study indicated that a minimum of 40 participants, each completing 10 pointing task trials, would achieve 83% power.

    “Using parameters estimated from own previous study (i.e., fixed effects beta coefficients and random effects’ variance; Kapaj et al., 2023), we found that a minimum of 40 participants, each completing 10 pointing task trials would achieve an 83% power (see data availability statement for study preregistration).”
  • Our results are in line with previous studies that the visualization style does not hinder wayfinders with high-spatial abilities.

    “On the other hand, our results are in line with the findings of previous studies that the visualization style does not hinder wayfinders with high-spatial abilities (Hegarty et al., 2009; Kapaj et al., 2021, 2023; Lanini-Maggi et al., 2021; Thrash et al., 2019; Wilkening & Fabrikant, 2011).”
  • The lack of direct influence of landmark visualization styles on spatial learning measures can be attributed to depicting landmarks as 3D building models in both conditions on the mobile map providing the necessary visual information to facilitate basic spatial learning required to solve the navigation task.

    “The lack of direct influence of landmark visualization styles on spatial learning measures can be attributed to the fact that depicting landmarks as 3D building models in both conditions on the mobile map could have provided the necessary visual information to facilitate the basic spatial learning required to solve the navigation task (Chrastil & Warren, 2012; Elias & Paelke, 2008; Kapaj et al., 2”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kapaj, A., Lanini-Maggi, S., Hilton, C., Cheng, B., & Fabrikant, S. I.
Affiliations
University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Kapaj, Armand
Venue
Cartography and Geographic Information Science
Published
2023-03-04
Volume
50
Issue
2
Pages
197-213
ISSN
  • 1523-0406 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-0465
OpenAlex
W4323360045
Cited by
24
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3
FWCI
1.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cartography and Geographic Information Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
H2020 - EXCELLENT SCIENCE - European Research Council (Advanced Grant GeoViSense (No. 740426))
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Geographic Information Systems Studies
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Geography Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
mobile maps, spatial learning, wayfinding, gaze behavior, visual attention, emergency navigation, map design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review