CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 49Philosophy and History of ScienceEvolution and Genetic DynamicsEvolution and Paleontology Studies

Networks and Hierarchies: Approaching Complexity in Evolutionary Theory

Tëmkin, Ilya, Eldredge, Niles·2015·Interdisciplinary Evolution Research
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-15045-1_6
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-15045-1_6

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Because of the nature of these transitions, they are likely to be relevant in our understanding of macroevolutionary processes, ranging from punctuated equilibrium to the hierarchical nature of evolutionary change and the role that constraints play in setting transition points.

    “Because of the nature of these transitions, they are likely to be relevant in our understanding of macroevolutionary processes, ranging from punctuated equilibrium [318] to the hierarchical nature of evolutionary change [346,347] and the role that constraints play in setting transition points [105,348,349].”

    From Fundamental constraints to the logic of living systems (2024) · cites this paper as [347]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Fundamental constraints to the logic of living systems

    Solé, R., Kempes, C. P., Corominas-Murtra, B., De Domenico, M., Kolchinsky, A., Lachmann, M., Libby, E., Saavedra, S., Smith, E., & Wolpert, D. (2024) · Interface Focus · doi:10.1098/rsfs.2024.0010 · Cited by 34 · see citing works

    “…the nature of these transitions, they are likely to be relevant in our understanding of macroevolutionary processes, ranging from punctuated equilibrium [318] to the hierarchical nature of evolutionary change [346,347] and the role that constraints play in setting transition points [105,348,349].”
    Background

Authors
Tëmkin, I., & Eldredge, N.
Affiliations
  • Smithsonian Institution (US)
  • American Museum of Natural History (US)
Corresponding author
Tëmkin, Ilya
ORCID
Venue
Interdisciplinary Evolution Research
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published
2015
Pages
183-226
ISSN
  • 2199-3068 (ISSN-L)
  • 2199-3076
DOI
10.1007/978-3-319-15045-1_6
OpenAlex
W14698614
Cited by
49
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6
FWCI
69.44
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
Interdisciplinary evolution research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Keywords
biological networks, levels of biological organization, economic hierarchy, network stability, evolutionary dynamics, robustness to disturbances

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review