The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the Quantum Measurement Problem
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Another class of examples are subjectivistic interpretations, which regard statements about outcomes of measurements as personal to an agent, such as “relational quantum mechanics”38, “QBism”39,40, or the approach proposed in ref. 9”
From Quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself (2018) · cites this paper as [9]
In the citing paper
“Theorem 1 may be compared to earlier no-go results, such as7–10,41–43, which also use assumptions similar to (Q) and (S) (although the latter is often implicit).”
From Quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself (2018) · cites this paper as [9]
In the citing paper
“In the context of this EWFS, Brukner [14, 15, 20] considered three assumptions, namely: freedom of choice , locality (in the sense of 'parameter independence' [21]) and observer-independent facts (OIF).”
From A strong no-go theorem on the Wigner’s friend paradox (2020) · cites this paper as [15]
Citations
Cites
Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical
Zurek, W. H. (2003) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.75.715 · Cited by 4,295
Speakable and Unspeakable in Quatum Mechanics
Bell, J. S., & Mermin, N. D. (1988) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.2811599 · Cited by 2,985
Unified dynamics for microscopic and macroscopic systems
Ghirardi, G. C., Rimini, A., & Weber, T. (1986) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.34.470 · Cited by 2,798
Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods
Peres, A., & Ballentine, L. E. (1995) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.17946 · Cited by 2,561
On gravity's role in quantum state reduction
Penrose, R. (1996) · General Relativity and Gravitation · doi:10.1007/bf02105068 · Cited by 1,872
Rovelli, C. (1996) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf02302261 · Cited by 1,381
Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics: Collected Papers on Quantum Philosophy
Bell, J. S., & Aspect, A. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815676 · Cited by 1,261
Models for universal reduction of macroscopic quantum fluctuations
Diósi, L. (1989) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.40.1165 · Cited by 1,017
Wigner, E. P. (1963) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1969254 · Cited by 846
Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods
Peres, A., & Mayer, M. E. (1994) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.2808757 · Cited by 703
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- I. Pitowsky, Quantum mechanics as a theory of probability, in Festschrift in honor of Jeffrey Bub, ed. by W. Demopoulos, I. Pitowsky (Springer, Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, New York, 2007)
- E. Wigner, Symmetries and Reflections (Indiana University Press, 1967), p. 164
- H.-J. Stöckmann, Q. Chaos, An Introduction (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself
Frauchiger, D., & Renner, R. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05739-8 · Cited by 333
“The authors might want to see Brukner’s recent paper, arXiv:1804.00749v1: “A nogo theorem for observer-independent facts”, wherein he derived a result similar to theirs.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialQuantum mechanics and the covariance of physical laws in quantum reference frames
Giacomini, F., Castro-Ruiz, E., & Brukner, Č. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-08155-0 · Cited by 365
Self-citationQuantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself
Frauchiger, D., & Renner, R. (2018) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.3929/ethz-b-000293141 · Cited by 241
A strong no-go theorem on the Wigner’s friend paradox
Bong, K.-W., Utreras-Alarcón, A., Ghafari, F., Liang, Y.-C., Tischler, N., Cavalcanti, E. G., Pryde, G. J., & Wiseman, H. M. (2020) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-020-0990-x · Cited by 224
A change of perspective: switching quantum reference frames via a perspective-neutral framework
Vanrietvelde, A., Höhn, P. A., Giacomini, F., & Castro-Ruiz, E. (2020) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2020-01-27-225 · Cited by 217
Metadata
- Authors
- Brukner, Č.
- Affiliations
- University of Vienna (AT)
- Corresponding author
- Brukner, Časlav
- ORCID
- Brukner, Časlav
- Venue
- The Frontiers Collection
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2016-11-16
- Pages
- 95-117
- ISSN
- 1612-3018 (ISSN-L)
- 2197-6619
- OpenAlex
- W1417962967
- Cited by
- 152
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3
- FWCI
- 36.22
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- The frontiers collection (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Austrian Science Fund
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
- Keywords
- measurement problem, Copenhagen interpretation, hidden variables, quantum mechanics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
