Cited by 1,017Quantum Mechanics and ApplicationsNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesRelativity and Gravitational Theory

Models for universal reduction of macroscopic quantum fluctuations

Diósi, L.·1989·Physical Review A

Abstract

This paper adopts the hypothesis that the absence of macroscopic quantum fluctuations is due to a certain universal mechanism. Such a mechanism has recently been proposed by Ghirardi et al. [Phys. Rev. D 34, 470 (1986)], and here we recapitulate a compact version of it. K\'arolyh\'azy [Nuovo Cimento 52, 390 (1966)] showed earlier the possible role of gravity and, along this line, we construct here a new parameter-free unification of micro- and macrodynamics. We apply gravitational measures for reducing macroscopic quantum fluctuations of the mass density. This model leads to classical trajectories in the macroscopic limit of translational motion. For massive objects, unwanted macroscopic superpositions of quantum states become destroyed in very short times. The relation between state-vector and density-operator formalisms has also been discussed. We only anticipate the need for elaborating characteristic predictions of the model in the region separating micro- and macroscopic properties.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.40.1165

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Assumption (Q) is manifestly violated by theories that postulate a modification of standard quantum mechanics, such as spontaneous and gravity-induced collapse models.

    “Assumption (Q) is manifestly violated by theories that postulate a modification of standard quantum mechanics, such as spontaneous16–20 and gravity-induced21–23 collapse models (cf. 24 for a review).”
  • DP is a proposal for extending quantum mechanics that takes the bridge between quantum and classical physics as a quantum-gravitational phenomenon.

    “Diósi-Penrose objective reduction (DP) is a particular proposal for an extension of current quantum mechanics, taking the bridge between quantum-and classical-level physics as a 'quantum-gravitational' phenomenon.”

    From Consciousness in the universe (2014) · cites this paper as [97]

  • The Diósi-Penrose (DP) proposal gives an objective physical threshold, providing a plausible lifetime for quantum-superposed states.

    “The DP proposal gives an objective physical threshold, providing a plausible lifetime for quantum-superposed states.”

    From Consciousness in the universe (2014) · cites this paper as [97]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Diósi, L.
Corresponding author
Diósi, L.
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
1989-08-01
Volume
40
Issue
3
Pages
1165-1174
ISSN
0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2065788435
Cited by
1,017
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 49 · 2025: 70 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 55 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 65
FWCI
6.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
Keywords
wave function collapse, mass density fluctuations, macroscopic superposition, classical trajectories, density matrix formalism, quantum measurement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review