Cited by 301Emotion and Mood RecognitionEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesSentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining

Emotion Recognition Using Multimodal Deep Learning

Liu, Wei, Zheng, Wei-Long, Lu, Bao-Liang·2016·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-46672-9_58

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, W., Zheng, W.-L., & Lu, B.-L.
Affiliations
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
Corresponding author
Lu, Bao-Liang
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2016
Pages
521-529
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W2525648609
Cited by
301
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 1
FWCI
23.52
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Keywords
emotion recognition, multimodal deep learning, EEG, eye tracking, SEED dataset, DEAP dataset, physiological signals, complementary information

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review