Cited by 354Emotion and Mood RecognitionEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesFace and Expression Recognition

Multimodal fusion framework: A multiresolution approach for emotion classification and recognition from physiological signals

Verma, Gyanendra K., Tiwary, Uma Shanker·2014·NeuroImage

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is twofold: (i) to investigate the emotion representation models and find out the possibility of a model with minimum number of continuous dimensions and (ii) to recognize and predict emotion from the measured physiological signals using multiresolution approach. The multimodal physiological signals are: Electroencephalogram (EEG) (32 channels) and peripheral (8 channels: Galvanic skin response (GSR), blood volume pressure, respiration pattern, skin temperature, electromyogram (EMG) and electrooculogram (EOG)) as given in the DEAP database. We have discussed the theories of emotion modeling based on i) basic emotions, ii) cognitive appraisal and physiological response approach and iii) the dimensional approach and proposed a three continuous dimensional representation model for emotions. The clustering experiment on the given valence, arousal and dominance values of various emotions has been done to validate the proposed model. A novel approach for multimodal fusion of information from a large number of channels to classify and predict emotions has also been proposed. Discrete Wavelet Transform, a classical transform for multiresolution analysis of signal has been used in this study. The experiments are performed to classify different emotions from four classifiers. The average accuracies are 81.45%, 74.37%, 57.74% and 75.94% for SVM, MLP, KNN and MMC classifiers respectively. The best accuracy is for 'Depressing' with 85.46% using SVM. The 32 EEG channels are considered as independent modes and features from each channel are considered with equal importance. May be some of the channel data are correlated but they may contain supplementary information. In comparison with the results given by others, the high accuracy of 85% with 13 emotions and 32 subjects from our proposed method clearly proves the potential of our multimodal fusion approach.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.11.007

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies found general recognition rates from 57.77% to 85.46% for different emotional states.

    “Previous studies have provided evidence for general recognition rate from 57,77% to 85,46% for different emotional states”

    From Survey on AI-Based Multimodal Methods for Emotion Detection (2019) · cites this paper as [66]

  • A larger set of analyzed signals and more recognized emotions provides better results.

    “that more higher set of analyzed signals and more recognized emotions provides better results [64][65][66].”

    From Survey on AI-Based Multimodal Methods for Emotion Detection (2019) · cites this paper as [66]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Verma, G. K., & Tiwary, U. S.
Affiliations
Indian Institute of Information Technology Allahabad (IN)
Corresponding author
Verma, Gyanendra K.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-11
Volume
102
Pages
162-172
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1963753144
Cited by
354
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 6
FWCI
1.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face and Expression Recognition
Keywords
emotion recognition, multimodal fusion, physiological signals, multiresolution analysis, discrete wavelet transform, EEG, DEAP database, emotion representation, appraisal theory, basic emotions, peripheral physiological signals, emotion classification
MeSH terms
Emotions, Humans, Models, Neurological, Electrophysiological Phenomena, Wavelet Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review