Cited by 23Embodied and Extended CognitionAction Observation and SynchronizationChild and Animal Learning Development

Social Affordance

de Carvalho, Eros Moreira·2020·Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_1870-1

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Our affordance-based approach captures social complexity by recognizing that social interactions involve distinct affordances.

    “Our affordance-based approach captures social complexity by recognizing that social interactions involve distinct affordances (Carvalho, 2020 ).”

    From Understanding Agent Complexity Through Affordances (2025) · cites this paper as Carvalho, 2020

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Carvalho, E. M.
Venue
Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior
Published
2020
Pages
1-4
OpenAlex
W4249030454
Cited by
23
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
Type
reference entry
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
social affordances, affordances, direct perception, ecological psychology, social cognition, social interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review