Cited by 150Embodied and Extended CognitionPhilosophy and Theoretical ScienceCybernetics and Technology in Society

Reconceiving representation-hungry cognition: an ecological-enactive proposal

Open access
Kiverstein, Julian D, Rietveld, Erik·2018·Adaptive Behavior

Abstract

Enactive approaches to cognitive science aim to explain human cognitive processes across the board without making any appeal to internal, content-carrying representational states. A challenge to such a research programme in cognitive science that immediately arises is how to explain cognition in so-called ‘representation-hungry’ domains. Examples of representation-hungry domains include imagination, memory, planning and language use in which the agent is engaged in thinking about something that may be absent, possible or abstract. The challenge is to explain how someone could think about things that are not concretely present in their environment other than by means of an internal mental representation. We call this the ‘Representation-Hungry Challenge’ (RHC). The challenge we take up in this article is to show how hunger for representations could possibly be satisfied by means other than the construction and manipulation of internal representational states. We meet this challenge by developing a theoretical framework that integrates key ideas drawn from enactive cognitive science and ecological psychology. One of our main aims is thus to show how ecological and enactive theories as non-representational and non-computational approaches to cognitive science might work together. From enactive cognitive science, we borrow the thesis of the strict continuity of lower and higher cognition. We develop this thesis to argue against any sharp conceptual distinction between higher and lower cognition based on representation-hunger. From ecological psychology, we draw upon our earlier work on the rich landscape of affordances. We propose thinking of so-called representation-hungry cognition in terms of temporally extended activities in which the agent skilfully coordinates to a richly structured landscape of affordances. In our framework, putative cases of representation-hungry cognition are explained by abilities to coordinate nested activities to an environment structured by interrelated socio-material practices. The RHC has often figured in arguments for the limitations of non-representational approaches to cognitive science. We showcase the theoretical resources available to an integrated ecological-enactive approach for addressing this type of sceptical challenge.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1059712318772778

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These frameworks suggest that the temporal dynamics of neural activity may reflect ongoing engagement with the environment rather than sequential updating of internal models.

    “They also suggest that the temporal dynamics of neural activity may reflect ongoing engagement with the environment rather than sequential updating of internal models (Kiverstein and Rietveld 2018; Raja 2019).”

    From The myth of the Bayesian brain (2025) · cites this paper as Kiverstein and Rietveld 2018

    Section 4, “Situating enactive cognition in a landscape of affordances” (page unavailable), says recurrent patterns of neural activity depend on agent–environment couplings. Section 6 rejects the need to manipulate internal models in its account of imagining, but the paper does not specifically contrast neural temporal dynamics with sequential updating of such models. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Barker R. G. (1968). Ecological psychology: Concepts and methods for studying the environment of human behaviour. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
  2. Hutto D. D. Myin E. (2013). Radical enactivism: Basic minds without content. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  3. Kuhn T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
  4. Merleau-Ponty M. (1963). The structure of behaviour (Fisher A. L. Trans.).. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
  5. Noë A. (2004). Action in Perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  6. Reed E. S. (1996). Encountering the world: Towards and ecological psychology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  7. Rietveld E. Denys D. Van Westen M. (in press). Ecological-enactive cognition as engaging with a field of relevant affordances: The skilled intentionality framework (SIF). In Newen A. De Bruin L. Gallagher S. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of 4E (Embodied, embedded, extended, enactive) cognition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  8. Shapiro L. (2011). Embodied cognition. London, England: Routledge.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kiverstein, J. D., & Rietveld, E.
Affiliations
University of Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Kiverstein, Julian D
Venue
Adaptive Behavior
Published
2018-05-23
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
147-163
ISSN
  • 1059-7123 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2633
OpenAlex
W2803921558
Cited by
150
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 2
FWCI
10.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Adaptive Behavior (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Vidi - awarded to Erik Rietveld)
  • H2020 European Research Council (Starting grant number 679190)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
Keywords
enactive cognition, ecological psychology, affordances, imagination, memory, planning, language use, socio-material practices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review