Cited by 70Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications

Predicting Slice-to-Volume Transformation in Presence of Arbitrary Subject Motion

Open access
Hou, Benjamin, Alansary, Amir, McDonagh, Steven, Davidson, Alice, Rutherford, Mary, Hajnal, Jo V., Rueckert, Daniel, Glocker, Ben +1 more·2017·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-66185-8_34

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ten studies that trained on synthetic data never meaningfully tested on real data.

    “and perhaps worst, ten studies that trained on synthetic data never even tested (meaningfully) on real data (Hou et al., 2017, 2018; Pei et al., 2017; Xie et al., 2017; Bier et al., 2018; Foote et al., 2019; Guan et al., 2019; Yang and Chen, 2019; Neumann et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2020).”

    From The Impact of Machine Learning on 2D/3D Registration for Image-Guided Interventions: A Systematic Review and Perspective (2021) · cites this paper as Hou et al., 2017

    For the cited Hou et al. (2017) study, the Experiments and Results section (pp. 5–6) explicitly reports testing on a real-world set of 34 fetal brain MRI scans and gives a prediction-error result. It also describes an experiment using motion-corrupted fetal MRI slices to test the method under real conditions. The paper therefore contradicts the claim that this study never meaningfully tested on real data; it cannot establish what the other nine cited studies did. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hou, B., Alansary, A., McDonagh, S., Davidson, A., Rutherford, M., Hajnal, J. V., Rueckert, D., Glocker, B., & Kainz, B.
Affiliations
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Hou, Benjamin
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2017
Pages
296-304
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W2591825272
Cited by
68
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4
FWCI
1.92
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Nvidia
  • Wellcome Trust (102431)
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (102431, EP/N024494/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Keywords
2D-3D registration, subject motion, intensity-based registration, fetal MRI, motion compensation, CT image reconstruction, X-ray projections

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review