Cited by 200Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesMedical Imaging Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications

Fast Volume Reconstruction From Motion Corrupted Stacks of 2D Slices

Open access
Kainz, Bernhard, Steinberger, Markus, Wein, Wolfgang, Kuklisova-Murgasova, Maria, Malamateniou, Christina, Keraudren, Kevin, Torsney-Weir, Thomas, Rutherford, Mary +3 more·2015·IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging

Abstract

Capturing an enclosing volume of moving subjects and organs using fast individual image slice acquisition has shown promise in dealing with motion artefacts. Motion between slice acquisitions results in spatial inconsistencies that can be resolved by slice-to-volume reconstruction (SVR) methods to provide high quality 3D image data. Existing algorithms are, however, typically very slow, specialised to specific applications and rely on approximations, which impedes their potential clinical use. In this paper, we present a fast multi-GPU accelerated framework for slice-to-volume reconstruction. It is based on optimised 2D/3D registration, super-resolution with automatic outlier rejection and an additional (optional) intensity bias correction. We introduce a novel and fully automatic procedure for selecting the image stack with least motion to serve as an initial registration target. We evaluate the proposed method using artificial motion corrupted phantom data as well as clinical data, including tracked freehand ultrasound of the liver and fetal Magnetic Resonance Imaging. We achieve speed-up factors greater than 30 compared to a single CPU system and greater than 10 compared to currently available state-of-the-art multi-core CPU methods. We ensure high reconstruction accuracy by exact computation of the point-spread function for every input data point, which has not previously been possible due to computational limitations. Our framework and its implementation is scalable for available computational infrastructures and tests show a speed-up factor of 1.70 for each additional GPU. This paves the way for the online application of image based reconstruction methods during clinical examinations. The source code for the proposed approach is publicly available.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tmi.2015.2415453

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kainz, B., Steinberger, M., Wein, W., Kuklisova-Murgasova, M., Malamateniou, C., Keraudren, K., Torsney-Weir, T., Rutherford, M., Aljabar, P., Hajnal, J. V., & Rueckert, D.
Affiliations
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • Graz University of Technology (AT)
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University of Vienna (AT)
Corresponding author
Kainz, Bernhard
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
Published
2015-09
Volume
34
Issue
9
Pages
1901-1913
ISSN
  • 0278-0062 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-254X
OpenAlex
W1994514622
Cited by
200
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3
FWCI
12.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Greenwich Academic Literature Archive (University of Greenwich) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • City Research Online (City University London) (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health Research (Biomedical Research Centre based at Guy's and St T)
  • EU FP7 (FP7-PEOPLE-2012-IEF F.A.U.S.T. 325661)
  • Austrian Science Fund (P23329)
  • Kings College London Medical Engineering Centre (iFIND [102431])
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Keywords
slice-to-volume reconstruction, motion artifacts, multi-GPU acceleration, 2D-3D registration, super-resolution, outlier removal, point spread function, freehand ultrasound, fetal MRI, liver imaging, online reconstruction
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Female, Humans, Liver, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Pregnancy, Ultrasonography, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Phantoms, Imaging, Imaging, Three-Dimensional

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review