The Issue of Metal Resources in Li-Ion Batteries for Electric Vehicles
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The difference between recycling technologies is not so much in recycling efficiency for individual materials, but whether materials are recovered and in what chemical form and purity.
“The difference between the recycling technologies is not so much in the recycling efficiency for individual materials, but whether materials are recovered and in what chemical form and purity”
From Future material demand for automotive lithium-based batteries (2020) · cites this paper as [9]
Cites
Contribution of Li-Ion Batteries to the Environmental Impact of Electric Vehicles
Notter, D. A., Gauch, M., Widmer, R., Wäger, P. A., Stamp, A., Zah, R., & Althaus, H. (2010) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es903729a · Cited by 842 · see citing works
Life cycle assessment of a lithium-ion battery vehicle pack
Ellingsen, L. A., Majeau‐Bettez, G., Singh, B., Srivastava, A. K., Valøen, L. O., & Strømman, A. H. (2014) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.12072 · Cited by 665 · see citing works
Majeau-Bettez, G., Hawkins, T. R., & Strømman, A. H. (2011) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es103607c · Cited by 662 · see citing works
Life cycle assessment of lithium-ion batteries for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles–Critical issues
Zackrisson, M., Avellán, L., & Orlenius, J. (2010) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.06.004 · Cited by 551 · see citing works
Stock dynamics for forecasting material flows—Case study for housing in The Netherlands
B. Müller, D. (2006) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.09.025 · Cited by 513 · see citing works
Bauer, C., Hofer, J., Althaus, H.-J., Del Duce, A., & Simons, A. (2015) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.019 · Cited by 430 · see citing works
The role of automobiles for the future of aluminum recycling
Modaresi, R., & Müller, D. B. (2012) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es300648w · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Simon, B., Ziemann, S., & Weil, M. (2015) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.07.011 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Self-citationSelenium and selenium-sulfur cathode materials for high-energy rechargeable magnesium batteries
Zhao‐Karger, Z., Lin, X.-M., Minella, C. B., Wang, D., Diemant, T., Behm, R. J., & Fichtner, M. (2016) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.05.034 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Kushnir, D., & Sandén, B. A. (2011) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.05.006 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Aging of Lithium-Ion Batteries in Electric Vehicles
Keil, P. (2017) · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Recycling of Traction Batteries as a Challenge and Chance for Future Lithium Availability
Weil, M., & Ziemann, S. (2014) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-59513-3.00022-4 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Self-citationKeller, M., Vaalma, C., Buchholz, D., et al. (2016) · ChemElectroChem · doi:10.1002/celc.201600152 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
The Prospects for Hybrid Electric Vehicles, 2005-2020: Results of a Delphi Study
Ng, H., Vyas, A., & Santini, D. J. (1999) · SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series · doi:10.4271/1999-01-2942 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Elektrochemische Energiespeicher für mobile Anwendungen im Fokus der Systemanalyse
Weil, M., Peters, J. F., Baumann, M., Dura, H., & Zimmermann, B. (2015) · TATuP Zeitschrift für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Theorie und Praxis · doi:10.14512/tatup.24.3.20 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Future material demand for automotive lithium-based batteries
Xu, C., Dai, Q., Gaines, L., Hu, M., Tukker, A., & Steubing, B. (2020) · Communications Materials · doi:10.1038/s43246-020-00095-x · Cited by 898 · see citing works
Toward a cell‐chemistry specific life cycle assessment of lithium‐ion battery recycling processes
Mohr, M., Peters, J. F., Baumann, M., & Weil, M. (2020) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.13021 · Cited by 326 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Weil, M., Ziemann, S., & Peters, J.
- Affiliations
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE)
- Helmholtz-Institute Ulm (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Weil, Marcel
- Venue
- Green Energy and Technology
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2018
- Pages
- 59-74
- ISSN
- 1865-3529 (ISSN-L)
- 1865-3537
- OpenAlex
- W2788557276
- Cited by
- 52
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 18.19
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Green energy and technology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Extraction and Separation Processes
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
- Keywords
- lithium-ion batteries, electric vehicles, critical metals, dynamic material flow analysis, battery recycling, lithium, cobalt, nickel, copper, aluminum, manganese, phosphorus, electric vehicle batteries
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
