Cited by 259Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Logic, Reasoning, and KnowledgeAI-based Problem Solving and Planning

Explainable AI: The New 42?

Open access
Goebel, Randy, Chander, Ajay, Holzinger, Katharina, Lecue, Freddy, Akata, Zeynep, Stumpf, Simone, Kieseberg, Peter, Holzinger, Andreas·2018·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-99740-7_21

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Archival theories have been animated in documenting data in the context of AI and ML, including through documentation frameworks like Datasheets for Datasets.

    “I show how archival theories have been animated in documenting data in the context of AI and ML, including through documentation frameworks like Datasheets for Datasets”

    From Can AI provenance inform archival provenance? (2026) · cites this paper as Goebel et al. 2018

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 24 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goebel, R., Chander, A., Holzinger, K., Lecue, F., Akata, Z., Stumpf, S., Kieseberg, P., & Holzinger, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • Fujitsu (United States) (US)
  • SBA Research (AT)
  • Max Planck Institute for Informatics (DE)
  • City, University of London (GB)
  • University of Applied Sciences St Pölten (AT)
  • Medical University of Graz (AT)
Corresponding author
Goebel, Randy
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2018
Volume
LNCS-11015
Pages
295-303
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W2888580379
Cited by
259
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 3
FWCI
12.90
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • City Research Online (City University London) (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
Keywords
explainable AI, explainability, artificial neural networks, black-box models, expert systems, abductive reasoning, probabilistic reasoning, uncertainty management, interpretability, contextual adaptation, human-AI augmentation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review