Cited by 534Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Advanced Neural Network Applications

Generating Visual Explanations

Hendricks, Lisa Anne, Akata, Zeynep, Rohrbach, Marcus, Donahue, Jeff, Schiele, Bernt, Darrell, Trevor·2016·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-46493-0_1

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hendricks, L. A., Akata, Z., Rohrbach, M., Donahue, J., Schiele, B., & Darrell, T.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Max Planck Institute for Informatics (DE)
  • International Computer Science Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Hendricks, Lisa Anne
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2016
Pages
3-19
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W2332488709
Cited by
534
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 104 · 2020: 90 · 2019: 71 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
17.32
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
explainable classification, vision-language models, image captioning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review