Cited by 131Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-votingCryptography and Data SecurityPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data

Statistical Disclosure or Intersection Attacks on Anonymity Systems

Danezis, George, Serjantov, Andrei·2004·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-540-30114-1_21

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Danezis, G., & Serjantov, A.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2004
Pages
293-308
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W1484474218
Cited by
131
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.46
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Keywords
anonymity, anonymity networks, intersection attacks, information leakage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review