CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 353Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningOnline Learning and AnalyticsArtificial Intelligence in Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Detecting Student Misuse of Intelligent Tutoring Systems

Baker, Ryan Shaun, Corbett, Albert T., Koedinger, Kenneth R.·2004·Lecture Notes in Computer Science
DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-30139-4_50
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-540-30139-4_50

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High frequency of submissions may indicate 'gaming the system' rather than constructive iteration.

    “aligning with some studies in the context of ITS that a high frequency of submissions may indicate 'gaming the system' rather than constructive iteration (Baker et al., 2004).”

    From Assessing the Impact and Underlying Pathways of Sequenced AI feedback on Student Learning (2026) · cites this paper as Baker et al., 2004

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Aleven, V., Koedinger, K.R.: Investigations into Help Seeking and Learning with a Cognitive Tutor. In: Luckin, R. (ed.) Papers of the AIED-2001 Workshop on Help Provision and Help Seeking in Interactive Learning Environments, pp. 47–58 (2001)
  2. Aleven, V., McLaren, B., Roll, I., Koedinger, K.: Toward Tutoring Help Seeking: Applying Cognitive Modeling to Meta-Cognitive Skills. To appear at Intelligent Tutoring Systems Conference (2004) · DOI
  3. Arbreton, A.: Student Goal Orientation and Help-Seeking Strategy Use. In: Karabenick, S.A. (ed.) Strategic Help Seeking: Implications For Learning And Teaching, pp. 95–116. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (1998)
  4. Baker, R.S., Corbett, A.T., Koedinger, K.R.: Learning to Distinguish Between Representations of Data: a Cognitive Tutor That Uses Contrasting Cases. To appear at International Conference of the Learning Sciences (2004)
  5. Baker, R.S., Corbett, A.T., Koedinger, K.R., Wagner, A.Z.: Off-Task Behavior in the Cognitive Tutor Classroom: When Students “Game the System”. In: Proceedings of ACM CHI 2004: Computer-Human Interaction, pp. 383–390 (2004) · DOI
  6. Corbett, A.T., Koedinger, K.R., Hadley, W.S.: Cognitive Tutors: From the Research Classroom to All Classrooms. In: Goodman, P. (ed.) Technology Enhanced Learning: Opportunities For Change, pp. 235–263. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2001)
  7. de Vicente, A., Pain, H.: Informing the Detection of the Students’ Motivational State: an Empirical Study. In: Cerri, S.A., Gouarderes, G., Paraguacu, F. (eds.) Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, pp. 933–943 (2002) · DOI
  8. del Soldato, T., du Boulay, B.: Implementation of Motivational Tactics in Tutoring Systems. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 6(4), 337–376 (1995)
  9. Donaldson, W.: Accuracy of d’ and A’ as Estimates of Sensitivity. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 31(4), 271–274 (1993) · DOI
  10. Lloyd, J.W., Loper, A.B.: Measurement and Evaluation of Task-Related Learning Behavior: Attention to Task and Metacognition. School Psychology Review 15(3), 336–345 (1986) · DOI
  11. Maris, E.: Psychometric Latent Response Models. Psychometrika 60(4), 523–547 (1995) · DOI
  12. Martin, J., vanLehn, K.: Student Assessment Using Bayesian Nets. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 42, 575–591 (1995) · DOI
  13. Mostow, J., Aist, G., Beck, J., Chalasani, R., Cuneo, A., Jia, P., Kadaru, K.: A La Recherche du Temps Perdu, or As Time Goes By: Where Does the Time Go in a Reading Tutor that Listens? In: Sixth International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, pp. 320–329 (2002) · DOI
  14. Ramsey, F.L., Schafer, D.W.: The Statistical Sleuth: A Course in Methods of Data Analysis. Duxbury Press, Belmont (1997) Section 12.3
  15. Schofield, J.W.: Computers and Classroom Culture. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995) · DOI
  16. Wood, H., Wood, D.: Help Seeking, Learning, and Contingent Tutoring. Computers and Education 33, 153–159 (1999) · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Baker, R. S., Corbett, A. T., & Koedinger, K. R.
Affiliations
Carnegie Mellon University (US)
ORCID
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published
2004
Pages
531-540
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
DOI
10.1007/978-3-540-30139-4_50
OpenAlex
W1589525026
Cited by
353
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 18
FWCI
8.93
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
Keywords
intelligent tutoring systems, gaming the system, machine learning, learning outcomes, tutor feedback, student behavior detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review