Cited by 25Geographic Information Systems StudiesHistorical Geography and Cartography3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Non-Realistic 3D Maps for Navigation with Mobile Devices

Plesa, Malisa Ana, Cartwright, William·2008·Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-540-37110-6_5

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Plesa, M. A., & Cartwright, W.
Affiliations
RMIT University (AU)
Venue
Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography
Published
2008-02-19
Pages
80-104
OpenAlex
W58758987
Cited by
25
References
49
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
16.73
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Geographic Information Systems Studies
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Historical Geography and Cartography
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › 3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications
Keywords
3D mapping, mobile navigation, mobile devices, personal digital assistants, map presentation, 3D imagery, prototype testing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review