Cited by 166Information Retrieval and Search BehaviorEthics and Social Impacts of AIMedia Influence and Politics

Search Engine Bias and the Demise of Search Engine Utopianism

Open access
Goldman, E.·2008·Information Science and Knowledge Management

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-540-75829-7_8

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goldman, E.
Affiliations
Santa Clara University (US)
Corresponding author
Goldman, E.
Venue
Information Science and Knowledge Management
Published
2008
Pages
121-133
ISSN
1568-1300 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1670552626
Cited by
166
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 4
FWCI
18.45
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Information science and knowledge management (publishedVersion)
  • Santa Clara Law Digital Commons (Santa Clara University) (submittedVersion)
  • bepress Legal Repository (submittedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
Keywords
search engine bias, search engine optimization, personalized search, search engine regulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review