Attitudinal and Intentional Acceptance of Domestic Robots by Younger and Older Adults
Open accessAbstract
A study was conducted to examine the expectations that younger and older individuals have about domestic robots and how these expectations relate to robot acceptance. In a questionnaire participants were asked to imagine a robot in their home and to indicate how much items representing technology, social partner, and teammate acceptance matched their robot. There were additional questions about how useful and easy to use they thought their robot would be. The dependent variables were attitudinal and intentional acceptance. The analysis of the responses of 117 older adults (aged 65-86) and 60 younger adults (aged 18-25) indicated that individuals thought of robots foremost as performance-directed machines, less so as social devices, and least as unproductive entities. The robustness of the Technology Acceptance Model to robot acceptance was supported. Technology experience accounted for the variance in robot acceptance due to age.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Participants recommended that the robot will incrementally introduce new features and be able to support and encourage older adults to use the technology as an installation method.
“• Option 4: Robot will incrementally introduce new features and be able to support and encourage older adults to use the technology (Dewar and Dutton, 1986; Green et al., 1995; Ezer et al., 2009).”
From Personal Narratives in Technology Design: The Value of Sharing Older Adults’ Stories in the Design of Social Robots (2021) · cites this paper as Ezer et al., 2009
The Introduction says incremental innovations are generally accepted more readily than disruptive technologies, and the Discussion links ease of use to acceptance of domestic robots. Neither section reports participants recommending gradual feature introduction or a robot-led method of supporting older adults during installation. The cited paper supports the rationale for the option, not the specific recommendation. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483 · see citing works
A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926 · Cited by 23,066 · see citing works
Carayannis, E. G. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-3858-8_100431 · Cited by 4,818 · see citing works
Davis, F. D. (1993) · International Journal of Man-Machine Studies · doi:10.1006/imms.1993.1022 · Cited by 4,754 · see citing works
Karahanna, E., Straub, D. W., & Chervany, N. L. (1999) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249751 · Cited by 3,709 · see citing works
The Adoption of Radical and Incremental Innovations: An Empirical Analysis
Dewar, R. D., & Dutton, J. E. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.11.1422 · Cited by 2,472 · see citing works
Breazeal, C. (2003) · Robotics and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1016/s0921-8890(02)00373-1 · Cited by 1,037 · see citing works
Older adults' attitudes towards and perceptions of ‘smart home’ technologies: a pilot study
Demiris, G., Rantz, M., Aud, M. A., Marek, K. D., Tyrer, H. W., Skubic, M., & Hussam, A. A. (2004) · Medical Informatics and the Internet in Medicine · doi:10.1080/14639230410001684387 · Cited by 669 · see citing works
What is a robot companion - friend, assistant or butler?
Dautenhahn, K., Woods, S., Kaouri, C., Walters, M. L., Koay, K. L., & Werry, I. (2005) · 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems · doi:10.1109/iros.2005.1545189 · Cited by 540 · see citing works
Assessing a Multidimensional Measure of Radical Technological Innovation
Green, S. G., Gavin, M. B., & Aiman-Smith, L. (1995) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/17.403738 · Cited by 457 · see citing works
'It's just like you talk to a friend': relational agents for older adults
Bickmore, T. W., Caruso, L., Clough-Gorr, K., & Heeren, T. (2005) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2005.09.002 · Cited by 341 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The studies that have been conducted have generally measured responses of older adults to specific robots with limited functionality [15, 16, 17].”
BackgroundExperiences with a mobile robotic guide for the elderly
Montemerlo, M., Pineau, J., Roy, N., Thrun, S., & Verma, V. (2002) · doi:10.5555/777092.777183 · Cited by 297 · see citing works
2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems
Hodgson, S., Tavakoli, M., Lelevé, A., & Pham, M. T. (2005) · IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros.2005.1544945 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
A technology and nursing collaboration to help older adults age in place
Rantz, M., Marek, K. D., Aud, M. A., Tyrer, H. W., Skubic, M., Demiris, G., & Hussam, A. A. (2005) · Nursing Outlook · doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2004.05.004 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
MOVAID: a personal robot in everyday life of disabled and elderly people
Dario, P., Guglielmelli, E., Laschi, C., & Teti, G. (1999) · Technology and Disability · doi:10.3233/tad-1999-10202 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Interaction platforms and techniques
Jacko, J. A. (2007) · Springer eBooks · Cited by 52 · see citing works
A cost–benefit analysis methodology for assessing product adoption by older user populations
Sharit, J., Czaja, S. J., Perdomo, D. M., & Lee, C. C. (2004) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2003.12.003 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Human-Robot Interaction in the Home Ubiquitous Network Environment
Ueda, H., Minoh, M., Chikama, M., Satake, J., Kobayashi, A., Miyawaki, K., & Kidode, M. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-73107-8_109 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
An Intelligent Artifact as a Cohabitant: An Analysis of a Home Robot_s Conversation Log
Matsumoto, N., Yamazaki, T., Tokosumi, A., & Ueda, H. (2007) · International Conference on Innovative Computing, Information and Control · doi:10.1109/icicic.2007.158 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 20 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Toward a Framework for Levels of Robot Autonomy in Human-Robot Interaction
Beer, J. M., Fisk, A. D., & Rogers, W. A. (2014) · Journal of Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.5898/jhri.3.2.beer · Cited by 636 · see citing works
Self-citationTay, B., Jung, Y., & Park, T. (2014) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.014 · Cited by 490 · see citing works
A Systematic Review of Attitudes, Anxiety, Acceptance, and Trust Towards Social Robots
Naneva, S., Gou, M. S., Webb, T. L., & Prescott, T. J. (2020) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-020-00659-4 · Cited by 389 · see citing works
A review of technology acceptance by older adults
Chen, K., & Chan, A. H. S. (2011) · Gerontechnology · doi:10.4017/gt.2011.10.01.006.00 · Cited by 353 · see citing works
Factors Predicting Decisions About Technology Adoption Among Older Adults
Berkowsky, R. W., Sharit, J., & Czaja, S. J. (2017) · Innovation in Aging · doi:10.1093/geroni/igy002 · Cited by 323 · see citing works
Flandorfer, P. (2012) · International Journal of Population Research · doi:10.1155/2012/829835 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Domestic robots for older adults: attitudes, preferences, and potential
Smarr, C.-A., Mitzner, T. L., Beer, J. M., Prakash, A., Chen, T. L., Kemp, C. C., & Rogers, W. A. (2014) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-013-0220-0 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
Self-citationWhy Would I Use This in My Home? A Model of Domestic Social Robot Acceptance
de Graaf, M. M. A., Allouch, S. B., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2017) · Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/07370024.2017.1312406 · Cited by 255 · see citing works
Automated rationale generation: a technique for explainable AI and its effects on human perceptions
Ehsan, U., Tambwekar, P., Chan, L., Harrison, B., & Riedl, M. O. (2019) · Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces · doi:10.1145/3301275.3302316 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
Toward a Psychological Science of Advanced Technology Design for Older Adults
Rogers, W. A., & Fisk, A. D. (2010) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences · doi:10.1093/geronb/gbq065 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Self-citationAcceptance of socially assistive humanoid robot by preschool and elementary school teachers
Fridin, M., & Belokopytov, M. (2014) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.12.016 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Review of the Factors Affecting Acceptance of AI-Infused Systems
Ismatullaev, U. V. U., & Kim, S. (2022) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/00187208211064707 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Lee, H. R., & Šabanović, S. (2014) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/2559636.2559676 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Turja, T., Aaltonen, I., Taipale, S., & Oksanen, A. (2020) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2019.103220 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Horstmann, A. C., & Krämer, N. C. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00939 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Older Adults’ Preferences for and Acceptance of Robot Assistance for Everyday Living Tasks
Smarr, C.-A., Prakash, A., Beer, J. M., Mitzner, T. L., Kemp, C. C., & Rogers, W. A. (2012) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1071181312561009 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Self-citationInsights into Older Adults’ Technology Acceptance through Meta-Analysis
Ma, Q., Chan, A., & Teh, P. (2021) · International journal of human computer interactions · doi:10.1080/10447318.2020.1865005 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Huang, H.-L., Cheng, L., Sun, P., & Chou, S.-J. (2021) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-021-00752-2 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Home robotic devices for older adults: opportunities and concerns
Deutsch, I., Erel, H., Paz, M., Hoffman, G., & Zuckerman, O. (2019) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.04.002 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
An autonomous robotic exercise tutor for elderly people
Görer, B., Salah, A. A., & Akın, H. L. (2016) · Autonomous Robots · doi:10.1007/s10514-016-9598-5 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
A Review on the Use of Mobile Service Robots in Elderly Care
Asgharian, P., Panchea, A. M., & Ferland, F. (2022) · Robotics · doi:10.3390/robotics11060127 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Robots for Elderly Care: Review, Multi-Criteria Optimization Model and Qualitative Case Study
Sawik, B., Tobis, S., Baum, E., Suwalska, A., Kropińska, S., Stachnik, K., Bernabeu, E. P., Cildoz, M., Agustín, A., & Wieczorowska–Tobis, K. (2023) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare11091286 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Šabanović, S., Chang, W.-L., Bennett, C. C., Piatt, J. A., & Hakken, D. (2015) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20892-3_11 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Vandemeulebroucke, T., Dzi, K. T. J., & Gastmans, C. (2021) · Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics · doi:10.1016/j.archger.2021.104399 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Understanding the potential of PARO for healthy older adults
McGlynn, S. A., Kemple, S., Mitzner, T. L., King, C., & Rogers, W. A. (2016) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.12.004 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Self-citationSocial robots: The influence of human and robot characteristics on acceptance
Bishop, L. M., van Maris, A., Dogramadzi, S., & Zook, N. (2019) · Paladyn Journal of Behavioral Robotics · doi:10.1515/pjbr-2019-0028 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Older adults’ acceptance of a robot for partner dance-based exercise
Chen, T. L. B., Bhattacharjee, T., Beer, J. M., Ting, L. H., Hackney, M. E., Rogers, W. A., & Kemp, C. C. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0182736 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Self-citationMou, Y., Shi, C., Shen, T., & Xu, K. (2019) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2019.1663008 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Proposal for modeling social robot acceptance by retail customers: CAN model + technophobia
Navarro, A. S., Borondo, J. P., Lara, E. M. R., & Pascual, C. O. (2021) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102813 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Older Adults Living With Social Robots: Promoting Social Connectedness in Long-Term Communities
Ostrowski, A. K., DiPaola, D., Partridge, E., Park, H. W., & Breazeal, C. (2019) · IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine · doi:10.1109/mra.2019.2905234 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Understanding Robot Acceptance
Beer, J. M., Prakash, A., Mitzner, T. L., & Rogers, W. A. (2011) · SMARTech Repository (Georgia Institute of Technology) · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Self-citationDignity, Autonomy, and Style of Company
Coghlan, S., Waycott, J., Lazar, A., & Neves, B. B. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3449178 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Age Difference in Perceived Ease of Use, Curiosity, and Implicit Negative Attitude toward Robots
Chien, S.-E., Chu, L., Lee, H.-H., Yang, C.-C., Lin, F.-H., Yang, P.-L., Wang, T., & Yeh, S. (2019) · ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3311788 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Users' attitudes toward service robots in South Korea
Park, E., & del Pobil, A. P. (2013) · Industrial Robot the international journal of robotics research and application · doi:10.1108/01439911311294273 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
A phased framework for long-term user acceptance of interactive technology in domestic environments
de Graaf, M. M. A., Allouch, S. B., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2017) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444817727264 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Damholdt, M. F., Nørskov, M., Yamazaki, R., Hakli, R., Hansen, C. V., Vestergaard, C., & Seibt, J. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01701 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Ninomiya, T., Fujita, A., Suzuki, D., & Umemuro, H. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-25554-5_48 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Developing social robots for aging populations: A literature review of recent academic sources
Pedersen, I., Reid, S., & Aspevig, K. A. H. (2018) · Sociology Compass · doi:10.1111/soc4.12585 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Gerłowska, J., Skrobas, U., Grabowska-Aleksandrowicz, K., Korchut, A., Szklener, S., Szczęśniak-Stańczyk, D., Tzovaras, D. K., & Rejdak, K. (2018) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2018.00392 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Safe, Flexible and Productive Human-Robot-Collaboration for Disassembly of Lithium-Ion Batteries
Gerbers, R., Wegener, K., Dietrich, F., & Dröder, K. (2017) · Sustainable production, life cycle engineering and management · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-70572-9_6 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Zuckerman, O., Walker, D., Grishko, A., Moran, T., Levy, C., Lisak, B., Wald, I. Y., & Erel, H. (2020) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376411 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Olde Keizer, R. A. C. M., van Velsen, L., Moncharmont, M., Riche, B., Ammour, N., Del Signore, S., Zia, G., Hermens, H., & N’Dja, A. (2019) · Health and Technology · doi:10.1007/s12553-019-00320-9 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Overcoming Barriers and Increasing Independence – Service Robots for Elderly and Disabled People
Hersh, M. A. (2015) · International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems · doi:10.5772/59230 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Automated Rationale Generation: A Technique for Explainable AI and its Effects on Human PerceptionsPreprint
Ehsan, U., Tambwekar, P., Chan, L., Harrison, B. E., & Riedl, M. O. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1901.03729 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Sustainable Adaptation of New Technology—The Case of Humanoids Used for the Care of Older Adults
Ejdys, J., & Halicka, K. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10103770 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Tay, B. T. C., Park, T., Jung, Y., Tan, Y. K., & Wong, A. H. Y. (2013) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-39360-0_29 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
A realistic, virtual head for human–computer interaction
Marcos-Pablos, S., Gómez‐García‐Bermejo, J., & Zalama, E. (2009) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2009.12.002 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
A Robot a Day Keeps the Blues Away
Bennett, C. C., Sabanovic, S., Piatt, J. A., Nagata, S., Eldridge, L., & Randall, N. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI) · doi:10.1109/ichi.2017.43 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Older People’s Prior Robot Attitudes Influence Evaluations of a Conversational Robot
Stafford, R. Q., MacDonald, B. A., Li, X., & Broadbent, E. (2014) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-013-0224-9 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Robots and the Possibility of Humanistic Care
Coghlan, S. (2021) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-021-00804-7 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Horstmann, A. C., & Krämer, N. C. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0238133 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Attitudes towards care robots among Finnish home care personnel – a comparison of two approaches
Rantanen, T., Lehto, P., Vuorinen, P., & Coco, K. (2017) · Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences · doi:10.1111/scs.12508 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
A Community-Centered Design Framework for Robot-Assisted Feeding Systems
Bhattacharjee, T., Cabrera, M. E., Caspi, A., Çakmak, M., & Srinivasa, S. S. (2019) · International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS) · doi:10.1145/3308561.3353803 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Robotics to support aging in place
Mois, G., & Beer, J. M. (2020) · Living with Robots · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-815367-3.00003-7 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Fraune, M. R., Komatsu, T., Preusse, H. R., Langlois, D., Au, R. H. Y., Ling, K., Suda, S., Nakamura, K., & Tsui, K. M. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.904019 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
He, Y., He, Q., & Liu, Q. (2022) · Journal of Healthcare Engineering · doi:10.1155/2022/6334732 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
In-home and remote use of robotic body surrogates by people with profound motor deficits
Grice, P. M., & Kemp, C. C. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0212904 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Towards a new scale for assessing attitudes towards social robots
Damholdt, M. F., Vestergaard, C., Nørskov, M., Hakli, R., Larsen, S., & Seibt, J. (2020) · Interaction Studies Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems · doi:10.1075/is.18055.fle · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Elderly’s acceptance of companion robots from the perspective of user factors
Huang, T., & Huang, C. (2019) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-019-00692-9 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Yamato, N., Sumioka, H., Ishiguro, H., Shiomi, M., & Kohda, Y. (2023) · Journal of Technology in Human Services · doi:10.1080/15228835.2023.2292058 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Ostrowski, A. K., Harrington, C. N., Breazeal, C., & Park, H. W. (2021) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2021.716581 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Troncone, A., Amorese, T., Cuciniello, M., Saturno, R., Pugliese, L., Cordasco, G., Vogel, C. M., & Esposito, A. A. (2020) · Acta Polytechnica Hungarica · doi:10.12700/aph.17.2.2020.2.10 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
“THIS ISN’T ME!”: The Role of Age-Related Self- and User Images for Robot Acceptance by Elders
Dudek, M., Baisch, S., Knopf, M., & Kolling, T. (2020) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-020-00678-1 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Tobis, S., Piasek-Skupna, J., Cylkowska-Nowak, M., & Suwalska, A. (2022) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s22051717 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Ethical implications in using robots among older adults living with dementia
Deusdad, B. A. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1436273 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Understanding Older Adults’ Perceptions of Usefulness for the Paro Robot
McGlynn, S. A., Kemple, S., Mitzner, T. L., King, C., & Rogers, W. A. (2014) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1541931214581400 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Self-citationFactors that influence robot acceptance
Xu, L., & Yu, F. (2019) · Chinese Science Bulletin (Chinese Version) · doi:10.1360/tb-2019-0136 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Masril, M., Ambiyar, A., Jalinus, N., Ridwan, R., & Hendrik, B. (2021) · International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications · doi:10.14569/ijacsa.2021.0120216 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Daniele, K., Marcucci, M., Cattaneo, C., Borghese, N. A., & Zannini, L. (2019) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/13228 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
L’interaction Homme-Robot, de l’anthropomorphisme à l’humanisation
Spatola, N. (2019) · L’Année psychologique · doi:10.3917/anpsy1.194.0515 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Horstmann, A. C., Gratch, J. S., & Krämer, N. C. (2021) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102683 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Dupuy, L., Micoulaud‐Franchi, J., & Philip, P. (2020) · Journal of Sleep Research · doi:10.1111/jsr.13094 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Chiu, C., Hua, L.-C., Chou, C.-Y., & Chiang, J.-H. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0265384 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Informal caregivers’ perception of assistive robots in eldercare
Tan, S., Yap, Y.-Y., Tan, S., & Wong, C. K. (2024) · Journal of Open Innovation Technology Market and Complexity · doi:10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100234 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Leshner, C. E., & Johnson, J. (2024) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/02654075241234377 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Halicka, K., & Surel, D. (2022) · Human Technology · doi:10.14254/1795-6889.2022.18-2.5 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
The role of consumer robots in our everyday lives
Lum, H. C. (2019) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-815367-3.00007-4 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Impacts of a Care Robotics Project on Finnish Home Care Workers’ Attitudes towards Robots
Rantanen, T., Leppälahti, T., Porokuokka, J., & Heikkinen, S. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17197176 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Beach, S. R., Schulz, R., Matthews, J. T., Courtney, K. L., & Dabbs, A. D. (2013) · Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology · doi:10.3109/17483107.2013.832412 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Final results of the NINFA project: impact of new technologies in the daily life of elderly people
Cinini, A., Cutugno, P., Ferraris, C., Ferretti, M., Marconi, L., Morgavi, G., & Nerino, R. (2019) · Aging Clinical and Experimental Research · doi:10.1007/s40520-019-01357-6 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Social robot – Jack of all trades?
Kühne, K., Jeglinski-Mende, M. A., Fischer, M. H., & Zhou, Y. (2022) · Paladyn Journal of Behavioral Robotics · doi:10.1515/pjbr-2022-0002 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Human, Organisational and Societal Factors in Robotic Rail Infrastructure Maintenance
Golightly, D., Chan-Pensley, J., Dadashi, N., Jundi, S., Ryan, B., & Hall, A. C. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14042123 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Factors influencing the intention to use assistive technologies by older adults
Ejdys, J., & Gulc, A. (2022) · Human Technology · doi:10.14254/1795-6889.2022.18-1.2 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Raymundo, T. M., & Santana, C. D. S. (2014) · IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine · doi:10.1109/mce.2014.2340071 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
The introduction of care robots as a leadership challenge in home care facilities in Finland
Rantanen, T., Leppälahti, T., & Coco, K. (2021) · Nursing Open · doi:10.1002/nop2.933 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Factors associated with intention to use care robots among people with physical disabilities
Jung, S. H., & Shin, Y. S. (2024) · Nursing Outlook · doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2024.102145 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Challenges in Seniors Adopting Assistive Robots: A Systematic Review
Ariani, A., Kapadia, V., Talaei‐Khoei, A., Li, J., & RAY, P. K. (2016) · The International Technology Management Review · doi:10.2991/itmr.2016.6.2.1 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Baggett, R., Šimeček, M., Tsui, K. M., & Fraune, M. R. (2024) · Robotics · doi:10.3390/robotics13070095 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Attitude Toward and Intention to Use Care Robot Technology in Older Adults and Family Members
Han, A., & Park, Y. (2019) · Korean Journal of Adult Nursing · doi:10.7475/kjan.2019.31.6.650 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Goo, H. G., Winkle, K., Williams, T., & Strait, M. K. (2023) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/ro-man57019.2023.10309640 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
The domestication of robotic vacuum cleaners among seniors
Frennert, S., & Östlund, B. (2014) · Gerontechnology · doi:10.4017/gt.2014.12.3.004.00 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
User acceptance of driverless vehicles and robots with aspect of personal economy
Kencebay, B. (2019) · Journal of Transnational Management · doi:10.1080/15475778.2019.1664234 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Dimensions of people's attitudes toward robots
Suzuki, D., & Umemuro, H. (2012) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/2157689.2157779 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Individual Differences in Spatial Orientation Modulate Perspective Taking in Listeners
Loy, J. E., & Demberg, V. (2023) · Journal of Cognition · doi:10.5334/joc.321 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Bayles, M. A., Lee, J., Kadylak, T., & Rogers, W. A. (2023) · Gerontechnology · doi:10.4017/gt.2023.22.2.bay.08 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citationDesigning Robots for Marketplace Success: A Case Study with Technology for Behavior and Habit Change
Randall, N., & Šabanović, S. (2024) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-023-01093-y · Cited by 6 · see citing works
The Multifaceted Nature of Robotic Companionship when Presented as a Secondary Function
Erel, H., Dado, O., Manor, A., & Zuckerman, O. (2021) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3411763.3451582 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Exploring the Acceptance and Adoption of Humanoid Robots Among Older Adults: Systematic Review
Elsheikh, A., & Al‐Thani, D. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-61698-3_25 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Towards Pervasive Mobility Assessments in Clinical and Domestic Environments
Isken, M., Frenken, T., Frenken, M., & Hein, A. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-16226-3_4 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
O’Brien, M. A., & Rogers, W. A. (2012) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-1966-1.ch006 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Ezer, N., Fisk, A. D., & Rogers, W. A.
- Affiliations
- Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
- ORCID
- Rogers, Wendy A.
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2009
- Volume
- 5615
- Pages
- 39-48
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- PMC
- PMC4288776
- OpenAlex
- W1698088155
- Cited by
- 134
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 6.25
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (P01AG017211)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
- Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
- Keywords
- home robots, robot acceptance, technology acceptance, older adults, young adults, age differences, technology experience, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, social robots, technology acceptance model
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review