The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Privacy Awareness: A Means to Solve the Privacy Paradox?
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Even if people theoretically have all of the necessary privacy-relevant information, they are unable to make proper sense of all of the information.This leads to the application of simplified mental models that are often favor the benefits (Pötzsch, 2009).”
From The privacy paradox – investigating discrepancies between expressed privacy concerns and actual online behavior – a systematic literature review (2017) · cites this paper as Pötzsch, 2009
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Simon, H. A. (1997) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/4711.001.0001 · Cited by 4,900
Warren, S. D., & Brandeis, L. D. (1890) · University of Washington Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780295803661-014 · Cited by 4,092
Information revelation and privacy in online social networks
Gross, R., & Acquisti, A. (2005) · Proceedings of the 2005 ACM workshop on Privacy in the electronic society · doi:10.1145/1102199.1102214 · Cited by 2,028
Westin, A. F. (1967) · Cited by 1,908
Imagined Communities: Awareness, Information Sharing, and Privacy on the Facebook
Acquisti, A., & Gross, R. (2006) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/11957454_3 · Cited by 1,895
Westin, A. F. (1970) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 1,861
The Privacy Paradox: Personal Information Disclosure Intentions versus Behaviors
NORBERG, P. A., HORNE, D. R., & HORNE, D. A. (2007) · Journal of Consumer Affairs · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6606.2006.00070.x · Cited by 1,526
Awad, N. F., & Krishnan, M. S. (2006) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148715 · Cited by 1,252
Jagatic, T. N., Johnson, N. A., Jakobsson, M., & Menczer, F. (2007) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/1290958.1290968 · Cited by 1,156
Personalization versus Privacy: An Empirical Examination of the Online Consumer’s Dilemma
Chellappa, R. K., & Sin, R. G. (2005) · Information Technology and Management · doi:10.1007/s10799-005-5879-y · Cited by 1,101
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Barth, S., & de Jong, M. D. T. (2017) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2017.04.013 · Cited by 798
Privacy concerns and disclosure of biometric and behavioral data for travel
Ioannou, A., Tussyadiah, I. P., & Lü, Y. (2020) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102122 · Cited by 167
Calzada, I. (2022) · Smart Cities · doi:10.3390/smartcities5030057 · Cited by 155
Privacy awareness about information leakage
Malandrino, D., Petta, A., Scarano, V., Serra, L., Spinelli, R., & Krishnamurthy, B. (2013) · ACM Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society (WPES) · doi:10.1145/2517840.2517868 · Cited by 87
Communal Acts of IoT Consumers: A Potential Threat to Security and Privacy
Khan, W. Z., Aalsalem, M. Y., & Khan, M. K. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics · doi:10.1109/tce.2018.2880338 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- Pötzsch, S.
- Affiliations
- Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Pötzsch, Stefanie
- Venue
- IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2009
- Pages
- 226-236
- ISSN
- 1868-422X (ISSN-L)
- 1868-4238
- OpenAlex
- W2139903329
- Cited by
- 107
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 5.88
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- IFIP advances in information and communication technology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Fundación Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela
- European Commission (216483)
- Technische Universität Dresden
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Keywords
- privacy paradox, privacy awareness, personal information disclosure, intention-behavior gap, human resource constraints, digital communication, privacy attitudes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
