The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Privacy Awareness: A Means to Solve the Privacy Paradox?
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Even if people theoretically have all of the necessary privacy-relevant information, they are unable to make proper sense of all of the information.This leads to the application of simplified mental models that are often favor the benefits (Pötzsch, 2009).”
From The privacy paradox – investigating discrepancies between expressed privacy concerns and actual online behavior – a systematic literature review (2017) · cites this paper as Pötzsch, 2009
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Simon, H. A. (1997) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/4711.001.0001 · Cited by 4,900
Warren, S. D., & Brandeis, L. D. (1890) · University of Washington Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780295803661-014 · Cited by 4,092
Information revelation and privacy in online social networks
Gross, R., & Acquisti, A. (2005) · Proceedings of the 2005 ACM workshop on Privacy in the electronic society · doi:10.1145/1102199.1102214 · Cited by 2,028
Westin, A. F. (1967) · Cited by 1,908
Imagined Communities: Awareness, Information Sharing, and Privacy on the Facebook
Acquisti, A., & Gross, R. (2006) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/11957454_3 · Cited by 1,895
Westin, A. F. (1970) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 1,861
The Privacy Paradox: Personal Information Disclosure Intentions versus Behaviors
NORBERG, P. A., HORNE, D. R., & HORNE, D. A. (2007) · Journal of Consumer Affairs · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6606.2006.00070.x · Cited by 1,526
Awad, N. F., & Krishnan, M. S. (2006) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148715 · Cited by 1,252
Jagatic, T. N., Johnson, N. A., Jakobsson, M., & Menczer, F. (2007) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/1290958.1290968 · Cited by 1,156
Personalization versus Privacy: An Empirical Examination of the Online Consumer’s Dilemma
Chellappa, R. K., & Sin, R. G. (2005) · Information Technology and Management · doi:10.1007/s10799-005-5879-y · Cited by 1,101
Privacy-Enhancing Technologies—approaches and development
Seničar, V., Jerman-Blažič, B., & Klobučar, T. (2003) · Computer Standards & Interfaces · doi:10.1016/s0920-5489(03)00003-5 · Cited by 646
Dimensions of Privacy Concern among Online Consumers
Sheehan, K. B., & Hoy, M. G. (2000) · Journal of Public Policy & Marketing · doi:10.1509/jppm.19.1.62.16949 · Cited by 607
E-privacy in 2nd generation E-commerce
Spiekermann, S., Großklags, J., & Berendt, B. (2001) · ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC) · doi:10.1145/501158.501163 · Cited by 454
Triggers and barriers to customizing software
Mackay, W. E. (1991) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems Reaching through technology - CHI '91 · doi:10.1145/108844.108867 · Cited by 364
Altman, I. (1976) · Environment and Behavior · doi:10.1177/001391657600800102 · Cited by 325
Web Site Delays: How Tolerant are Users?
Galletta, D. F., Henry, R. M., McCoy, S., & Polák, P. (2004) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00044 · Cited by 229
Introduction to Dataveillance and Information Privacy and Definitions of Terms
Clarke, R. (1997) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 213
Privacy: A Conceptual Analysis.
Altman, I. (1976) · Environment and Behavior · Cited by 210
Economic Aspects of Personal Privacy
Varian, H. R. (2009) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/b104899_7 · Cited by 181
A unified framework for dynamic pari-mutuel information market design
Agrawal, S., Delage, E., Peters, M., Wang, Z., & Yinyu Ye, Y. (2009) · ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC) · doi:10.1145/1566374.1566412 · Cited by 161
Personalization in privacy-aware highly dynamic systems
Sackmann, S., Strüker, J., & Accorsi, R. (2006) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/1151030.1151052 · Cited by 158
Newell, P. B. (1995) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/0272-4944(95)90018-7 · Cited by 151
Whose Identity Is It Anyway? Consumer Representation in the Age of Database Marketing
Zwick, D., & Dholakia, N. (2004) · Journal of Macromarketing · doi:10.1177/0276146704263920 · Cited by 151
Use of a P3P user agent by early adopters
Cranor, L. F., Arjula, M., & Guduru, P. (2002) · ACM Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society (WPES) · doi:10.1145/644527.644528 · Cited by 125
Privacy in Multimedia Communications: Protecting Users, Not Just Data
Adams, A., & Angela Sasse, M. (2001) · People and Computers XV—Interaction without Frontiers · doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-0353-0_4 · Cited by 114
The Future of Identity in the Information Society
Rannenberg, K., Royer, D., & Deuker, A. (2009) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-01820-6 · Cited by 101
Proceedings of the 2007 international ACM conference on Supporting group work
Gross, T., & Inkpen, K. M. (2007) · International Conference on Supporting Group Work · Cited by 81
Emerging Trends in Information and Communication Security
Müller, G. (2006) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/11766155 · Cited by 72
A Survey on Transparency Tools for Enhancing Privacy
Hedbom, H. (2009) · IFIP advances in information and communication technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-03315-5_5 · Cited by 51
People and Computers XV—Interaction without Frontiers
(2001) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-0353-0 · Cited by 48
Proceedings of the 3rd ACM conference on Electronic Commerce
Wellman, M. P., & Shoham, Y. (2001) · doi:10.1145/501158 · Cited by 48
Marrying Transparency Tools with User-Controlled Identity Management
Hansen, M. (2008) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-79026-8_14 · Cited by 47
Birnholtz, J. P., Gutwin, C. A., & Hawkey, K. (2007) · International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP) · doi:10.1145/1316624.1316632 · Cited by 46
Low Latency Anonymous Communication – How Long Are Users Willing to Wait?
Köpsell, S. (2006) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/11766155_16 · Cited by 29
MozPETs - a privacy enhanced Web Browser.
Brückner, L., & Voß, M. (2005) · Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust · Cited by 20
Editors comments: Rediscovering our IS roots
Sutton, S. G. (2004) · International Journal of Accounting Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.accinf.2004.02.001 · Cited by 16
Proceedings of the 2002 ACM workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society
Jajodia, S., & Samarati, P. (2002) · doi:10.1145/644527 · Cited by 12
European and American privacy: commerce, rights and justice — part 1
(2003) · Computer Law & Security Report · doi:10.1016/s0267-3649(03)00103-1 · Cited by 8
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Barth, S., & de Jong, M. D. T. (2017) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2017.04.013 · Cited by 798
Privacy concerns and disclosure of biometric and behavioral data for travel
Ioannou, A., Tussyadiah, I. P., & Lü, Y. (2020) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102122 · Cited by 167
Calzada, I. (2022) · Smart Cities · doi:10.3390/smartcities5030057 · Cited by 155
Privacy awareness about information leakage
Malandrino, D., Petta, A., Scarano, V., Serra, L., Spinelli, R., & Krishnamurthy, B. (2013) · ACM Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society (WPES) · doi:10.1145/2517840.2517868 · Cited by 87
Communal Acts of IoT Consumers: A Potential Threat to Security and Privacy
Khan, W. Z., Aalsalem, M. Y., & Khan, M. K. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics · doi:10.1109/tce.2018.2880338 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- Pötzsch, S.
- Affiliations
- Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Pötzsch, Stefanie
- Venue
- IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2009
- Pages
- 226-236
- ISSN
- 1868-422X (ISSN-L)
- 1868-4238
- OpenAlex
- W2139903329
- Cited by
- 107
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 5.88
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- IFIP advances in information and communication technology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Fundación Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela
- European Commission (216483)
- Technische Universität Dresden
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Keywords
- privacy paradox, privacy awareness, personal information disclosure, intention-behavior gap, human resource constraints, digital communication, privacy attitudes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
