Cited by 1,229Privacy, Security, and Data ProtectionInformation and Cyber SecurityPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data

Privacy attitudes and privacy behaviour: A review of current research on the privacy paradox phenomenon

Kokolakis, Spyros·2017·Computers & Security

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cose.2015.07.002

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The relationship between privacy attitudes and privacy behaviors is absent or weak at best.

    “As examined by Kokolakis (2017) in a comprehensive review, the relationship between privacy attitudes and privacy behaviors is absent or weak at best.”

    From Privacy Cynicism and its Role in Privacy Decision-Making (2024) · cites this paper as Kokolakis (2017)

  • Individuals worry about their privacy despite often disclosing information in exchange for being able to use online services.

    “Despite the apparent ease with which individuals often seem to disclose their information in exchange for being able to use online services (i.e., Carrascal etal., 2013; see also Kokolakis, 2017), individuals worry about their privacy.”

    From Privacy Cynicism and its Role in Privacy Decision-Making (2024) · cites this paper as Kokolakis, 2017

  • The evidence for the existence of the privacy paradox in terms of the absence of a direct link between privacy attitudes and behaviors is mixed.

    “The evidence for the existence of the privacy paradox in terms of the absence of a direct link between privacy attitudes and behaviors is mixed (for reviews, see Baruh etal., 2017; Kokolakis, 2017).”

    From Privacy Cynicism and its Role in Privacy Decision-Making (2024) · cites this paper as Kokolakis, 2017

  • Privacy cynicism may be one explanation of the incongruence between privacy attitudes and concerns and privacy behaviors.

    “Therefore, privacy cynicism may be one of the explanations of the incongruence between privacy attitudes and concerns and privacy behaviors (Barnes, 2006; Kokolakis, 2017; Lutz et al., 2020).”

    From Privacy Cynicism and its Role in Privacy Decision-Making (2024) · cites this paper as Kokolakis, 2017

  • Privacy behavior is highly context dependent, and users might show distinct privacy behavior in different contexts.

    “According to Kokolakis (2017), users might show distinct privacy behavior in different contexts, suggesting that privacy behavior is highly context dependent.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 70 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kokolakis, S.
Affiliations
University of the Aegean (GR)
Corresponding author
Kokolakis, Spyros
Venue
Computers & Security
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-01
Volume
64
Pages
122-134
ISSN
0167-4048 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2207884471
Cited by
1,229
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 142 · 2025: 164 · 2024: 129 · 2023: 165 · 2022: 168 · 2021: 142 · 2020: 121 · 2019: 81 · 2018: 66 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 1
FWCI
129.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers & Security (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Keywords
privacy paradox, privacy attitudes, privacy behavior, personal information disclosure, social networking sites, privacy concerns, behavioral economics, self-reported behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review