The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fiat-Shamir with Aborts: Applications to Lattice and Factoring-Based Signatures
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1205
(1999) · Industrial Robot: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/ir.1999.04926fae.001 · Cited by 38,662
Polynomial-time algorithms for prime factorization and discrete logarithms on a quantum computer
Shor, P. W. (1997) · SIAM Journal on Computing · doi:10.1137/s0097539795293172 · Cited by 8,472
On observing nondeterminism and concurrency
Hennessy, M., & Milner, R. (1980) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-10003-2_79 · Cited by 4,492
Factoring polynomials with rational coefficients
Lenstra, A. K., Lenstra, H. W., & Lovász, L. (1982) · Mathematische Annalen · doi:10.1007/bf01457454 · Cited by 4,018
How To Prove Yourself: Practical Solutions to Identification and Signature Problems
Fiat, A., & Shamir, A. (2007) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-47721-7_12 · Cited by 3,943
A Digital Signature Scheme Secure Against Adaptive Chosen-Message Attacks
Goldwasser, S., Micali, S., & Rivest, R. L. (1988) · SIAM Journal on Computing · doi:10.1137/0217017 · Cited by 2,804
Efficient signature generation by smart cards
Schnorr, C. P. (1991) · Journal of Cryptology · doi:10.1007/bf00196725 · Cited by 2,787
(1999) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-48405-1 · Cited by 2,619
Trapdoors for hard lattices and new cryptographic constructions
Gentry, C., Peikert, C., & Vaikuntanathan, V. (2008) · Proceedings of the fortieth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing · doi:10.1145/1374376.1374407 · Cited by 2,435
On lattices, learning with errors, random linear codes, and cryptography
Regev, O. (2005) · Proceedings of the thirty-seventh annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing · doi:10.1145/1060590.1060603 · Cited by 2,313
Cited by
Advances in quantum cryptography
Pirandola, S., Andersen, U. L., Banchi, L., Berta, M., Bunandar, D., Colbeck, R., Englund, D., Gehring, T., Lupo, C., Ottaviani, C., et al. (2020) · Advances in Optics and Photonics · doi:10.1364/aop.361502 · Cited by 2,033
Multiparty Computation from Somewhat Homomorphic Encryption
Damgård, I., Pastro, V., Smart, N., & Zakarias, S. (2012) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-32009-5_38 · Cited by 1,331
On Ideal Lattices and Learning with Errors over Rings
Lyubashevsky, V., Peikert, C., & Regev, O. (2013) · Journal of the ACM · doi:10.1145/2535925 · Cited by 836
Self-citationLattice Signatures without Trapdoors
Lyubashevsky, V. (2012) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-29011-4_43 · Cited by 827
Self-citationMaking NTRU as Secure as Worst-Case Problems over Ideal Lattices
Stehlé, D., & Steinfeld, R. (2011) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-20465-4_4 · Cited by 444
Metadata
- Authors
- Lyubashevsky, V.
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2009
- Pages
- 598-616
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W1506156414
- Cited by
- 558
- References
- 52
- FWCI
- 8.46
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fiat-Shamir with Aborts: Applications to Lattice and Factoring-Based Signatures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-3-642-10366-7_35
- The paper
- Lyubashevsky, V. (2009). Fiat-Shamir with Aborts: Applications to Lattice and Factoring-Based Signatures. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10366-7_35
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
