Cited by 94Action Observation and SynchronizationLanguage, Discourse, Communication StrategiesHealth, Education, and Physical Culture

Nonverbal Synchrony or Random Coincidence? How to Tell the Difference

Ramseyer, Fabian, Tschacher, Wolfgang·2010·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-642-12397-9_15

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This approach has recently been implemented in automated computer algorithms that can generate pseudo-interactions by randomly sampling from actual interpersonal interactions at very brief time intervals.

    “This approach has recently been implemented in automated computer algorithms that can generate pseudo-interactions by randomly sampling from actual interpersonal interactions at very brief time intervals (Ramseyer and Tschacher, 2010).”

    From Synchrony in Psychotherapy: A Review and an Integrative Framework for the Therapeutic Alliance (2016) · cites this paper as Ramseyer and Tschacher, 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ramseyer, F., & Tschacher, W.
Affiliations
University of Bern (CH)
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2010
Pages
182-196
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W1480223166
Cited by
94
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
12.84
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Health, Education, and Physical Culture
Keywords
nonverbal synchrony, accidental coincidences, face-to-face interaction, bootstrapping, surrogate testing, psychotherapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review