Cited by 590Action Observation and SynchronizationHealth, Education, and Physical CultureCommunication in Education and Healthcare

Coordinated movement and rapport in teacher–student interactions

Bernieri, Frank J.·1988·Journal of Nonverbal Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00986930

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Among romantic couples, the amount of rapport they feel correlates with the amount of mimicking during their interactions.

    “Some early research suggested that among romantic couples there is a correlation between the amount of rapport they feel with each other and the amount of mimicking that takes place during their interactions (Bernieri, 1988;see LaFrance, 1979see LaFrance, , 1982;;LaFrance & Broadbent, 1976 for related work).”

    From Social attitudes modulate automatic imitation (2010) · cites this paper as Bernieri, 1988

  • Independent judges observed more movement synchrony in videotaped interactions between high school students and their teachers than in control videos of randomly selected interactions.

    “independent judges observed more movement synchrony in videotaped interactions between high school students and their teachers, relative to control videos composed of randomly selected interactions (Bernieri, 1988).”
  • Interpersonal synchrony occurs more readily in the context of positive relationships.

    “Though interpersonal synchrony is ubiquitous, it occurs more readily in the context of positive relationships.”
  • Significantly more movement synchrony is observed when teachers and students mutually trust each other.

    “significantly more movement synchrony was observed when teachers and students mutually trusted each other.”
  • A sophisticated solution to the problem of separating synchrony from chance events is to construct 'pseudo-interactions', that is, artificial datasets of behavior of individuals who did not really interact with each other.

    “A sophisticated solution to this problem is to construct ‘pseudo-interactions’, that is, artificial datasets of behavior of individuals who did not really interact with each other (Bernieri, 1988).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bernieri, F. J.
Affiliations
Oregon State University (US)
Corresponding author
Bernieri, Frank J.
Venue
Journal of Nonverbal Behavior
Published
1988
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
120-138
ISSN
  • 0191-5886 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3653
OpenAlex
W2035093031
Cited by
590
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 34
FWCI
0.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Nonverbal Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Health, Education, and Physical Culture
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Communication in Education and Healthcare
Keywords
teacher-student relationship, interpersonal coordination, rapport, motor synchronization, nonverbal communication, high school students, self-reported anxiety, perceived friendliness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review