Cited by 92Social Robot Interaction and HRIVirtual Reality Applications and ImpactsAesthetic Perception and Analysis

In search of the uncanny valley

Pollick, Frank E.·2010·Lecture notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-642-12630-7_8

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pollick, F. E.
Affiliations
University of Glasgow (GB)
Corresponding author
Pollick, Frank E.
Venue
Lecture notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering
Published
2010
Pages
69-78
ISSN
  • 1867-8211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1867-822X
OpenAlex
W1493939802
Cited by
91
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 2
FWCI
14.81
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lecture notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
Keywords
uncanny valley, computer animation, robotics, human-robot interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review