Cited by 533Social Robot Interaction and HRIFace Recognition and PerceptionVirtual Reality Applications and Impacts

Too real for comfort? Uncanny responses to computer generated faces

Open access
MacDorman, Karl F., Green, Robert D., Ho, Chin-Chang, Koch, Clinton T.·2009·Computers in Human Behavior

Abstract

As virtual humans approach photorealistic perfection, they risk making real humans uncomfortable. This intriguing phenomenon, known as the uncanny valley, is well known but not well understood. In an effort to demystify the causes of the uncanny valley, this paper proposes several perceptual, cognitive, and social mechanisms that have already helped address riddles like empathy, mate selection, threat avoidance, cognitive dissonance, and psychological defenses. In the four studies described herein, a computer generated human character's facial proportions, skin texture, and level of detail were varied to examine their effect on perceived eeriness, human likeness, and attractiveness. In Study I, texture photorealism and polygon count increased human likeness. In Study II, texture photorealism heightened the accuracy of human judgments of ideal facial proportions. In Study III, atypical facial proportions were shown to be more disturbing on photorealistic faces than on other faces. In Study IV, a mismatch in the size and texture of the eyes and face was especially prone to make a character eerie. These results contest the depiction of the uncanny valley as a simple relation between comfort level and human likeness. This paper concludes by introducing a set of design principles for bridging the uncanny valley.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.026

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Becker E 1973 The denial of death New York Free Press
  2. Hanson D 2006 Exploring the aesthetic range of humanoid robots Proceedings of the ICCS/CogSci-2006 long symposium: Toward social mechanisms of android science 16 20
  3. Ramey CH 2005 The uncanny valley of similarities concerning abortion, baldness, heaps of sand, and humanlike robots Proceedings of views of the uncanny valley workshop: IEEE-RAS international conference on humanoid robots 8 13 Tsukuba, Japan

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MacDorman, K. F., Green, R. D., Ho, C.-C., & Koch, C. T.
Affiliations
Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
Corresponding author
MacDorman, Karl F.
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-05
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
695-710
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1986530040
Cited by
533
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 12
FWCI
24.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Purdue University Indianapolis (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
  • PMC
Funders
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P20GM066402)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
Keywords
uncanny valley, computer-generated faces, photorealism, facial proportions, skin texture, polygon count, human-likeness, attractiveness, virtual characters, design principles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review