Cited by 227Technology Use by Older AdultsInteractive and Immersive DisplaysUsability and User Interface Design

Elderly User Evaluation of Mobile Touchscreen Interactions

Open access
Kobayashi, Masatomo, Hiyama, Atsushi, Miura, Takahiro, Asakawa, Chieko, Hirose, Michitaka, Ifukube, Tohru·2011·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-642-23774-4_9

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Older adults could complete a range of touch gestures including point, drag and pinch.

    “Some work suggested that touch-screens might be beneficial for older adults (Lee et al., 2009;Findlater et al., 2013;Schneider et al., 2008), who could complete a range of touch gestures including point, drag and pinch (Kobayashi et al., 2011).”

    From Intuitive Learnability of Touch Gestures for Technology-Naive Older Adults (2015) · cites this paper as Kobayashi et al., 2011

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Costabile, M.F., Paternó, F. (eds.) INTERACT 2005. LNCS, vol. 3585, pp. 267-280. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
  2. Ueda, K., Okochi, N., Chikawa, A., Ito, A., Hiramatsu, Y., Ifukube, T.: Usability Evalua- tion of Mobile Phone for the Elderly: The Effect of Properties of the Button. In: Human In- terface 2009, pp. 673-676 (2009) (in Japanese)
  3. Stößel, C., Wandke, H., Blessing, L.: Gestural Interfaces for Elderly Users: Help or Hin- drance? In: Kopp, S., Wachsmuth, I. (eds.) GW 2009. LNCS, vol. 5934, pp. 269-280. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
  4. Stößel, C., Blessing, L.: Mobile Device Interaction Gestures for Older Users. In: Proceed- ings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (NordiCHI 2010): Ex- tending Boundaries, pp. 793-796 (2010)
  5. Arias-Torres, D.: The Design and Evaluation of a Pen-Based Computer Interface for Nov- ice Older Users. In: Proceedings of the 7th Mexican International Conference on Computer Science (ENC 2006), pp. 142-150 (2006)
  6. Mahmud, M., Kurniawan, H.: Involving Psychometric Tests for Input Device Evaluation with Older People. In: Proceedings of the 19th Conference of the Computer-Human Inter- action Special Interest Group (CHISIG) of Australia on Computer-Human Interaction: Citizens Online: Considerations for Today and the Future (November 21-25, 2005)
  7. Lepicard, G., Vigouroux, N.: Touch Screen User Interfaces for Older Subjects: Effect of the Targets Number and the Two Hands Use. In: Miesenberger, K., Klaus, J., Zagler, W., Karshmer, A. (eds.) ICCHP 2010. LNCS, vol. 6180, pp. 592-599. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
  8. Costabile, M.F., Paternó, F. (eds.) INTERACT 2005. LNCS, vol. 3585, pp. 253-266. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
  9. Kurniawan, S.: Older People and Mobile Phones: A Multi-Method Investigation. Interna- tional Journal of Human-Computer Studies 66(12), 889-901 (2008)
  10. Stone, R.G.: Mobile Touch Interfaces for the Elderly. In: Proceedings of ICT, Society and Human Beings (July 22-24, 2008)
  11. Guerreiro, T., Nicolau, H., Jorge, J., Goncalves, D.: Towards Accessible Touch Interfaces. In: Proceedings of the 12th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS 2010), pp. 19-26 (2010)
  12. Masui, T.: POBox: An efficient text input method for handheld and ubiquitous computers. In: Gellersen, H.-W. (ed.) HUC 1999. LNCS, vol. 1707, pp. 289-300. Springer, Heidel- berg (1999)
  13. Macdonald, A.S.: The UD Phenomenon in Japan: Product Innovation through Universal Design. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) HCI 2007. LNCS, vol. 4554, pp. 224-233. Springer, Hei- delberg (2007)
  14. Chikawa, A., Ueda, K., Okochi, N., Ito, A., Hiramatsu, Y., Ifukube, T.: Usability Evalua- tion of Touch Screen Mobile Phone for the Elderly. In: Human Interface 2009, pp. 677- 680 (2009) (in Japanese)
  15. Lee, S., Zhai, S.: The Performance of Touch Screen Soft Buttons. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2009), pp. 309-318 (2009)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kobayashi, M., Hiyama, A., Miura, T., Asakawa, C., Hirose, M., & Ifukube, T.
Affiliations
  • IBM Research - Tokyo (JP)
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
  • Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo (JP)
  • Institute of Gerontology, The University of Tokyo (JP)
Corresponding author
  • Kobayashi, Masatomo
  • Miura, Takahiro
  • Asakawa, Chieko
  • Hirose, Michitaka
  • Ifukube, Tohru
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2011
Volume
LNCS-6946
Issue
Part I
Pages
83-99
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W1770285669
Cited by
227
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 5
FWCI
39.47
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Japan Science and Technology Agency
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Interactive and Immersive Displays
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
Keywords
elderly users, touchscreen interaction, usability evaluation, gesture performance, software keyboard, user proficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review