Cited by 59Interactive and Immersive DisplaysTechnology Use by Older AdultsHand Gesture Recognition Systems

An exploratory study of a touch-based gestural interface for elderly

Leonardi, Chiara, Albertini, Adriano, Pianesi, Fabio, Zancanaro, Massimo·2010·Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries

Abstract

This paper presents the design ideas and a preliminary study of a touch-based gestural interface to support older adults in social networking. We had the hypothesis that the directness of gestures made them well suited to implement an interaction metaphor based on familiarity. Although preliminary, this hypothesis can be sustained. In particular, we found that most of the gestures (and in particular the iconic and the dynamic ones) have a hedonic quality that attracted and motivated our participants. We think that our results may contribute to the ongoing debate about gestural interfaces and help in understanding the value and the issue of this form of interaction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1868914.1869045

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Leonardi et al. (2010), only 2 of 15 older participants had some computer experience and the others had none.

    “For instance, in Findlater et al. (2013), 9 of 20 older adults used touch-screen devices on a daily basis and 3 had never used such devices; in Piper et al. (2010), 17 out of 20 older adults used computer daily, but in Leonardi et al. (2010) only 2 of 15 older participants had some computer experience and the others had none.”

    From Intuitive Learnability of Touch Gestures for Technology-Naive Older Adults (2015) · cites this paper as Leonardi et al., 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leonardi, C., Albertini, A., Pianesi, F., & Zancanaro, M.
Affiliations
FBK-irst, Trento, Italy
Venue
Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries
Publisher
ACM
Published
2010-10-16
Pages
845-850
OpenAlex
W2007211135
Cited by
58
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.67
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (publishedVersion)
  • Iris (University of Trento) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Interactive and Immersive Displays
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Hand Gesture Recognition Systems
Keywords
older adults, social networking, interaction metaphors, familiarity, iconic gestures, dynamic gestures, user motivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review