Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,210

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Process Mining Manifesto

Open access
van der Aalst, Wil, Adriansyah, Arya, de Medeiros, Ana Karla Alves, Arcieri, Franco, Baier, Thomas, Blickle, Tobias, Bose, Jagadeesh Chandra, van den Brand, Peter, Brandtjen, Ronald, Buijs, Joos, Burattin, Andrea, Carmona, Josep, Castellanos, Malu, Claes, Jan, Cook, Jonathan, Costantini, Nicola, Curbera, Francisco, Damiani, Ernesto, de Leoni, Massimiliano, Delias, Pavlos, van Dongen, Boudewijn F., Dumas, Marlon, Dustdar, Schahram, Fahland, Dirk, Ferreira, Diogo R., Gaaloul, Walid, van Geffen, Frank, Goel, Sukriti, Günther, Christian, Guzzo, Antonella, Harmon, Paul, ter Hofstede, Arthur, Hoogland, John, Ingvaldsen, Jon Espen, Kato, Koki, Kuhn, Rudolf, Kumar, Akhil, La Rosa, Marcello, Maggi, Fabrizio, Malerba, Donato, Mans, Ronny S., Manuel, Alberto, McCreesh, Martin, Mello, Paola, Mendling, Jan, Montali, Marco, Motahari-Nezhad, Hamid R., zur Muehlen, Michael, Munoz-Gama, Jorge, Pontieri, Luigi, Ribeiro, Joel, Rozinat, Anne, Seguel Pérez, Hugo, Seguel Pérez, Ricardo, Sepúlveda, Marcos, Sinur, Jim, Soffer, Pnina, Song, Minseok, Sperduti, Alessandro, Stilo, Giovanni, Stoel, Casper, Swenson, Keith, Talamo, Maurizio, Tan, Wei, Turner, Chris, Vanthienen, Jan, Varvaressos, George, Verbeek, Eric, Verdonk, Marc, Vigo, Roberto, Wang, Jianmin, Weber, Barbara, Weidlich, Matthias, Weijters, Ton, Wen, Lijie, Westergaard, Michael, Wynn, Moe·2012·Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing
DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-28108-2_19
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-642-28108-2_19

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,210

Metadata

Authors
van der Aalst, W., Adriansyah, A., de Medeiros, A. K. A., Arcieri, F., Baier, T., Blickle, T., Bose, J. C., van den Brand, P., Brandtjen, R., Buijs, J., Burattin, A., Carmona, J., Castellanos, M., Claes, J., Cook, J., Costantini, N., Curbera, F., Damiani, E., de Leoni, M., Delias, P., van Dongen, B. F., Dumas, M., Dustdar, S., Fahland, D., Ferreira, D. R., Gaaloul, W., van Geffen, F., Goel, S., Günther, C., Guzzo, A., Harmon, P., ter Hofstede, A., Hoogland, J., Ingvaldsen, J. E., Kato, K., Kuhn, R., Kumar, A., La Rosa, M., Maggi, F., Malerba, D., Mans, R. S., Manuel, A., McCreesh, M., Mello, P., Mendling, J., Montali, M., Motahari-Nezhad, H. R., zur Muehlen, M., Munoz-Gama, J., Pontieri, L., Ribeiro, J., Rozinat, A., Seguel Pérez, H., Seguel Pérez, R., Sepúlveda, M., Sinur, J., Soffer, P., Song, M., Sperduti, A., Stilo, G., Stoel, C., Swenson, K., Talamo, M., Tan, W., Turner, C., Vanthienen, J., Varvaressos, G., Verbeek, E., Verdonk, M., Vigo, R., Wang, J., Weber, B., Weidlich, M., Weijters, T., Wen, L., Westergaard, M., & Wynn, M.
Venue
Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published
2012
Pages
169-194
ISSN
  • 1865-1348 (ISSN-L)
  • 1865-1356
DOI
10.1007/978-3-642-28108-2_19
OpenAlex
W2101238481
Cited by
1,210
References
0
FWCI
129.93
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Process Mining Manifesto. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-3-642-28108-2_19
The paper
van der Aalst, W., Adriansyah, A., de Medeiros, A. K. A., Arcieri, F., Baier, T., Blickle, T., Bose, J. C., van den Brand, P., Brandtjen, R., Buijs, J., Burattin, A., Carmona, J., Castellanos, M., Claes, J., Cook, J., Costantini, N., Curbera, F., Damiani, E., de Leoni, M., . . . Wynn, M. (2012). Process Mining Manifesto. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28108-2_19

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.