Cited by 54Cryptography and Data SecurityCloud Data Security SolutionsAdvanced Authentication Protocols Security

Efficient, Compromise Resilient and Append-Only Cryptographic Schemes for Secure Audit Logging

Yavuz, Attila A., Ning, Peng, Reiter, Michael K.·2012·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-642-32946-3_12

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 50 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yavuz, A. A., Ning, P., & Reiter, M. K.
Affiliations
  • North Carolina State University (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2012
Pages
148-163
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W2183816381
Cited by
53
References
50
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.41
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • NCSU Libraries Repository (North Carolina State University Libraries) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Data Security Solutions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Advanced Authentication Protocols Security
Keywords
forward-secure signatures, public-key cryptography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review